ArticleSeminars in speech and language2020
A Compendium of Core Lexicon Checklists.
Article in Seminars in speech and language, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Benefits of Conversation Group Treatment for Individuals With Chronic Aphasia: Updated Evidence From a Multisite Randomized Controlled Trial on Measures of Language and Communication.American journal of speech-language pathology · 2025Trial
- Narrative Discourse Predictors of Response to Naming Intervention in Aphasia.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2026Article
- Automatically Calculated Context-Sensitive Features of Connected Speech Improve Prediction of Impairment in Alzheimer's Disease.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2025Article
- The curious case of the Cat Rescue: can picture narrative description inform visuospatial processing in aphasia?Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2025Article
- Access to context-specific lexical-semantic information during discourse tasks differentiates speakers with latent aphasia, mild cognitive impairment, and cognitively healthy adults.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2024Article
- DementiaBank: Theoretical Rationale, Protocol, and Illustrative Analyses.American journal of speech-language pathology · 2023Article
- Core lexicon in aphasia: A longitudinal study.Aphasiology · 2023Article
- Clinical Guidelines for Eliciting Discourse Using the RHDBank Protocol.American journal of speech-language pathology · 2022Article
- Quality of Measurement in Core Lexicon Measures.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2022Article
- Validation of an Automated Procedure for Calculating Core Lexicon From Transcripts.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2022Article
- Assessment of language impairment and function.Handbook of clinical neurology · 2022Review
- Main Concept, Sequencing, and Story Grammar Analyses of Cinderella Narratives in a Large Sample of Persons with Aphasia.Brain sciences · 2021Article
- Using AphasiaBank for Discourse Assessment.Seminars in speech and language · 2020Article
- Moving Toward Non-transcription based Discourse Analysis in Stable and Progressive Aphasia.Seminars in speech and language · 2020Article
- Measuring Change at the Discourse-Level Following Conversation Treatment: Examples From Mild and Severe Aphasia.Topics in language disordersArticle
- Making Sense of Right Hemisphere Discourse Using RHDBank.Topics in language disordersArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Core Lexicon (CoreLex) is a relatively new approach assessing lexical use in discourse. CoreLex examines the specific lexical items used to tell a story, or how typical lexical items are compared with a normative sample. This method has great potential for clinical utilization because CoreLex measures are fast, easy to administer, and correlate with microlinguistic and macrolinguistic discourse measures. The purpose of this article is to provide clinicians with a centralized resource for currently available CoreLex checklists, including information regarding development, norms, and guidelines for use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.