ArticleSeminars in speech and language2020
Moving Toward Non-transcription based Discourse Analysis in Stable and Progressive Aphasia.
Article in Seminars in speech and language, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.
- Written picture descriptions distinguish variants of primary progressive aphasia.Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD · 2025Article
- The curious case of the Cat Rescue: can picture narrative description inform visuospatial processing in aphasia?Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2025Article
- The Case of the Cookie Jar: Differences in Typical Language Use in Dementia.Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD · 2024Article
- Access to context-specific lexical-semantic information during discourse tasks differentiates speakers with latent aphasia, mild cognitive impairment, and cognitively healthy adults.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2024Article
- DementiaBank: Theoretical Rationale, Protocol, and Illustrative Analyses.American journal of speech-language pathology · 2023Article
- Quality of Measurement in Core Lexicon Measures.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2022Article
- An efficient, accurate and clinically-applicable index of content word fluency in Aphasia.Aphasiology · 2022Article
- Can discourse processing performance serve as an early marker of Alzheimer's disease and mild cognitive impairment? A systematic review of text comprehension.European journal of ageing · 2022Review
- Assessment of language impairment and function.Handbook of clinical neurology · 2022Review
- Main Concept, Sequencing, and Story Grammar Analyses of Cinderella Narratives in a Large Sample of Persons with Aphasia.Brain sciences · 2021Article
- Spectral Resting-State EEG (rsEEG) in Chronic Aphasia Is Reliable, Sensitive, and Correlates With Functional Behavior.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2021Article
- Development of a measure of function word use in narrative discourse: core lexicon analysis in aphasia.International journal of language & communication disorders · 2021Article
- Macrostructural Analyses of Cinderella Narratives in a Large Nonclinical Sample.American journal of speech-language pathology · 2020Article
- Using AphasiaBank for Discourse Assessment.Seminars in speech and language · 2020Article
- A Compendium of Core Lexicon Checklists.Seminars in speech and language · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Measurement of communication ability at the discourse level holds promise for predicting how well persons with stable (e.g., stroke-induced), or progressive aphasia navigate everyday communicative interactions. However, barriers to the clinical utilization of discourse measures have persisted. Recent advancements in the standardization of elicitation protocols and the existence of large databases for development of normative references have begun to address some of these barriers. Still, time remains a consistently reported barrier by clinicians. Non-transcription based discourse measurement would reduce the time required for discourse analysis, making clinical utilization a reality. The purpose of this article is to present evidence regarding discourse measures (main concept analysis, core lexicon, and derived efficiency scores) that are well suited to non-transcription based analysis. Combined with previous research, our results suggest that these measures are sensitive to changes following stroke or neurodegenerative disease. Given the evidence, further research specifically assessing the reliability of these measures in clinical implementation is warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.