ArticleTranslational oncology2020
Does Bone-targeted Therapy Benefit Patients with Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma?
Article in Translational oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Impact of bone-targeting agents on the clinical outcomes in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated with nivolumab: a sub-analysis of the Meet-URO 15 study.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- New players in the landscape of renal cell carcinoma bone metastasis and therapeutic opportunities.International journal of cancer · 2025Review
- Advanced renal cell carcinoma management: the Latin American Cooperative Oncology Group (LACOG) and the Latin American Renal Cancer Group (LARCG) consensus update.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2024Review
- Use of multikinase inhibitors/lenvatinib concomitant with antiresorptive therapy for bone metastases from radioiodine-resistant differentiated thyroid cancer.Cancer medicine · 2022Review
- Research progress of bone metastases: From disease recognition to clinical practice.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Review
- Routine Bone Imaging for Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma: Is it Time?Journal of kidney cancer and VHL · 2021Article
- Bone Metastases in Renal Cell Carcinoma: Impact of Immunotherapy on Survival.Cancer diagnosis & prognosisArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionIn metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC), the bone is the second most common site of metastasis and is associated with increased morbidity and poorer quality of life. Bone-targeted therapies (BTTs) such as denosumab and zoledronic acid may prevent skeletal-related events (SREs). However, the benefit of BTTs in combination with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) remains unclear.
methodsWe performed a retrospective chart review at the Urologic Cancer Centre for Research and Innovation. Patients with mRCC were included if they had bone metastases treated with TKIs between 2010 and 2017. Our primary outcome was overall survival (OS), defined as the time elapsed from clinical diagnosis of mRCC to death, and modelled using the Kaplan-Meier method. Secondary outcomes included the median time to SRE and the analysis of prognostic factors of OS using Cox proportional hazards regression.
resultsIn total, 230 patients with mRCC were identified; of which, 46 had bone metastases treated with TKIs and were included in the study (TKI-only, n = 37; TKI + BTT, n = 9). In the TKI + BTT cohort, patients received either denosumab (n = 5) or zoledronic acid (n = 4). At the time of analysis, 63% of patients were deceased. We observed an OS trend favouring the TKI + BTT cohort (13.8 months [95% confidence interval {CI}: 12.3-15.2] vs. 29.6 months [95% CI: 7.2-51.9], hazard ratio [HR]: 1.66 (95% CI: 0.62-4.45), P = 0.31). When patients in the TKI + BTT cohort were stratified by type of therapy (denosumab or zoledronic acid), the median time to SRE was similar between the groups (4.2 months [95% CI: 2.28-6.14] vs. 2.2 months [95% CI: not available], P = 0.71]. On univariate or multivariate analysis, it was found that age, gender, comorbidities, International metastatic RCC database consortium (IMDC) prognostic group and pathologic tumour grade were not significant predictors of worse OS. Pathologic stage 3 or 4 was an independent predictor of worse OS (HR: 5.8, 95% CI: 1.41-24.03, P = 0.015).
conclusionBTTs may have a continued role in the era of targeted therapy and immunotherapy. Further prospective data are required to validate our findings.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.