ArticleCognition2020
Do questionnaires reflect their purported cognitive functions?
Article in Cognition, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
25 citing papers in PubMed, 61 citations in OpenAlex.
- The relation of spatial skills, spatial memory span, and two anxiety types with statistics anxiety in European and North American University students.The British journal of educational psychology · 2026Article
- Challenges in the practical application of the Vienna test system for assessing cognitive functions in the general, athletic and clinical populations: a global scoping review of experimental and observational studies.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2026Review
- Neuroscientific Analysis of Logo Design: Implications for Luxury Brand Marketing.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- The Validation of the Danish Version of the Santa Barbara Sense of Direction Scale (SBSoDDK) and a Comparison of Performance on the SBSoD Across Samples with Different Nationalities.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Article
- Missing images: autobiographical memory in Aphantasia and blindness.Frontiers in cognition · 2025Review
- Peering into the future: Eye movements predict neural repetition effects during episodic simulation.Neuropsychologia · 2024Article
- Subjective memory measures: Metamemory questionnaires currently in use.Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006) · 2024Review
- An Ecological Mobile Momentary Intervention to Support Dynamic Goal Pursuit: Feasibility and Acceptability Study.JMIR formative research · 2024Article
- Taking stock of the past: A psychometric evaluation of the Autobiographical Interview.Behavior research methods · 2024Article
- Validating a theory of planned behavior questionnaire for assessing changes in professional behaviors of medical students.Frontiers in medicine · 2024Article
- Hippocampal subfields and their neocortical interactions during autobiographical memory.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2024Article
- Intrinsic functional connectivity among memory networks does not predict individual differences in narrative recall.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2024Article
- Effects of Aging on Successful Object Encoding: Enhanced Semantic Representations Compensate for Impaired Visual Representations.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2023Article
- Individual differences in the frequency of voluntary & involuntary episodic memories, future thoughts, and counterfactual thoughts.Psychological research · 2023Article
- Release of cognitive and multimodal MRI data including real-world tasks and hippocampal subfield segmentations.Scientific data · 2023Article
- Sleep Deprivation-Induced Changes in Baseline Brain Activity and Vigilant Attention Performance.Brain sciences · 2022Article
- Aesthetic experience enhances first-person spatial representation.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022Article
- Article
- Troubled past: A critical psychometric assessment of the self-report Survey of Autobiographical Memory (SAM).Behavior research methods · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Questionnaires are used widely across psychology and permit valuable insights into a person's thoughts and beliefs, which are difficult to derive from task performance measures alone. Given their importance and widespread use, it is vital that questionnaires map onto the cognitive functions they purport to reflect. However, where performance on naturalistic tasks such as imagination, autobiographical memory, future thinking and navigation is concerned, there is a dearth of knowledge about the relationships between task performance and questionnaire measures. Questionnaires are also typically designed to probe a specific aspect of cognition, when instead researchers sometimes want to obtain a broad profile of a participant. To the best of our knowledge, no questionnaire exists that asks simple single questions about a wide range of cognitive functions. To address these gaps in the literature, we recruited a large sample of participants (n=217), all of whom completed a battery of widely used questionnaires and performed naturalistic tasks involving imagination, autobiographical memory, future thinking and navigation. We also devised a questionnaire that comprised simple single questions about the cognitive functions of interest. There were four main findings. First, imagination and navigation questionnaires reflected performance on their related tasks. Second, memory questionnaires were associated with autobiographical memory vividness and not internal (episodic) details. Third, imagery questionnaires were more associated with autobiographical memory vividness and future thinking than the questionnaires purporting to reflect these functions. Finally, initial exploratory analyses suggested that a broad profile of information can be obtained efficiently using a small number of simple single questions, and these modelled task performance comparably to established questionnaires in young, healthy adults. Overall, while some questionnaires can act as proxies for behaviour, the relationships between memory and future thinking tasks and questionnaires are more complex and require further elucidation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.