Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31869604›Full record

ArticleThe Science of the total environment2020

The assessment and remediation of mercury contaminated sites: A review of current approaches.

Chris S Eckley, Cynthia C Gilmour, Sarah Janssen, Todd P Luxton, Paul M Randall, Lindsay Whalin, Carrie Austin

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Science of the total environment, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 120 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Systematic Review of the Health and Equity Impacts of Remediation and Redevelopment of Contaminated Sites.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. National-Scale Assessment of Total Gaseous Mercury Isotopes Across the United States.Journal of geophysical research. Atmospheres : JGR · 2023
    Article
  14. Unveiling the Role of Dissolved Organic Matter on the Hg Phytoavailability in Biochar-Amended Soils.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Mercury (Hg) Contaminated Sites in Kazakhstan: Review of Current Cases and Site Remediation Responses.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Chris S EckleyU.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region-10, 1200 6th Ave, Seattle, WA 98101, USA. Electronic address: eckley.chris@epa.gov.
Cynthia C GilmourSmithsonian Environmental Research Center, 647 Contees Wharf Rd., Edgewater, MD 21037-0028, USA. Electronic address: gilmourc@si.edu.
Sarah JanssenUSGS Upper Midwest Water Science Center, 8505 Research Way, Middleton, WI 53562, USA. Electronic address: sjanssen@usgs.gov.
Todd P LuxtonUS Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, National Risk Management Research Laboratory, 26 West Martin Luther King Drive, Cincinnati, OH 45268, USA. Electronic address: Luxton.todd@epa.gov.
Paul M RandallUS Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, Cincinnati, OH, USA. Electronic address: Randall.paul@epa.gov.
Lindsay WhalinSan Francisco Bay Water Board, 1515 Clay St., Ste. 1400, Oakland, CA 94612, USA. Electronic address: lwhalin@waterboards.ca.gov.
Carrie AustinSan Francisco Bay Water Board, 1515 Clay St., Ste. 1400, Oakland, CA 94612, USA. Electronic address: Carrie.Austin@waterboards.ca.gov.
Environmental Protection Agency · USBay Institute · USMRIGlobal · USSmithsonian Environmental Research Center · US

Funding

Intramural EPA EPA999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Remediation of mercury (Hg) contaminated sites has long relied on traditional approaches, such as removal and containment/capping. Here we review contemporary practices in the assessment and remediation of industrial-scale Hg contaminated sites and discuss recent advances. Significant improvements have been made in site assessment, including the use of XRF to rapidly identify the spatial extent of contamination, Hg stable isotope fractionation to identify sources and transformation processes, and solid-phase characterization (XAFS) to evaluate Hg forms. The understanding of Hg bioavailability for methylation has been improved by methods such as sequential chemical extractions and porewater measurements, including the use of diffuse gradient in thin-film (DGT) samplers. These approaches have shown varying success in identifying bioavailable Hg fractions and further study and field applications are needed. The downstream accumulation of methylmercury (MeHg) in biota is a concern at many contaminated sites. Identifying the variables limiting/controlling MeHg production-such as bioavailable inorganic Hg, organic carbon, and/or terminal electron acceptors (e.g. sulfate, iron) is critical. Mercury can be released from contaminated sites to the air and water, both of which are influenced by meteorological and hydrological conditions. Mercury mobilized from contaminated sites is predominantly bound to particles, highly correlated with total sediment solids (TSS), and elevated during stormflow. Remediation techniques to address Hg contamination can include the removal or containment of Hg contaminated materials, the application of amendments to reduce mobility and bioavailability, landscape/waterbody manipulations to reduce MeHg production, and food web manipulations through stocking or extirpation to reduce MeHg accumulated in desired species. These approaches often rely on knowledge of the Hg forms/speciation at the site, and utilize physical, chemical, thermal and biological methods to achieve remediation goals. Overall, the complexity of Hg cycling allows many different opportunities to reduce/mitigate impacts, which creates flexibility in determining suitable and logistically feasible remedies.

Indexed as

Contaminated sitesMercuryMethylmercuryRemediationSite assessment

Identifiers

PMID31869604
PMCPMC6980986
OpenAlexW2995568202

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.