Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31869360›Full record

ArticlePloS one2019

Cost effectiveness of therapeutic drug monitoring for imatinib administration in chronic myeloid leukemia.

Kibum Kim, Gwendolyn A McMillin, Philip S Bernard, Srinivas Tantravahi, Brandon S Walker, Robert L Schmidt

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kibum KimDepartment of Pathology and ARUP Laboratories, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-8676-7434
Gwendolyn A McMillinDepartment of Pathology and ARUP Laboratories, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, United States of America.
Philip S BernardDepartment of Pathology and ARUP Laboratories, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, United States of America.
Srinivas TantravahiDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Hematology and Hematological Malignancies, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, United States of America.
Brandon S WalkerDepartment of Pathology and ARUP Laboratories, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, United States of America.
Robert L SchmidtDepartment of Pathology and ARUP Laboratories, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, United States of America.
University of Utah · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundImatinib mesylate (IM) is a first-line treatment option for patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). Patients who fail or are intolerant to IM therapy are treated with more expensive second and third-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Patients show wide variation in trough concentrations in response to standard dosing. Thus, many patients receive subtherapeutic or supratherapeutic doses. Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) may improve dose management that, in turn, may reduce costs and improve outcomes. However, TDM also adds to the cost of patient care. The objective of this study was to determine the cost-effectiveness of TDM for generic IM therapy.

methodsWe developed a microsimulation model for the trough plasma concentration of IM which is related to a cytogenetic or molecular response. We compared two cohorts: one with TDM and one without TDM (NTDM). The lifetime incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was calculated using quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) as the effectiveness measure. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed.

resultsThe lifetime cost and QALY of treatment with TDM were $2,137K [95% Ci: 2,079K; 2,174K] and 12.37 [95% CI: 12.07; 12.55], respectively. The cost and QALY of NTDM were $2,132K [95% CI: 2,091K; 2,197K] and 12.23 [95% CI: 11.96; 12.50], respectively. The incremental cost and QALY for TDM relative to NTDM was $4,417 [95% CI: -52,582; 32,097]) and 0.15 [95% CI: -0.13; 0.28]. The ICER for TDM relative to NTDM was $30,450/QALY. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis showed that TDM was cost-effective relative to NTDM in 90% of the tested scenarios at a willingness-to-pay threshold of $100,000/QALY.

conclusionsAlthough the impact of TDM is modest, the cost-effectiveness over a lifetime horizon (societal perspective, ($30,450/QALY) falls within the acceptable range (< $100k/QALY).

Indexed as

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsComputer SimulationCost-Benefit AnalysisCytogenetic AnalysisDrug MonitoringDrug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsDrug Resistance, NeoplasmDrugs, GenericHematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationHumansImatinib MesylateLeukemia, Myelogenous, Chronic, BCR-ABL PositivePharmacogenomic TestingQuality-Adjusted Life YearsSurvival AnalysisDrugs, GenericImatinib Mesylate

Identifiers

PMID31869360
PMCPMC6927594
OpenAlexW2997339635

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.