Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31869351›Full record

ArticlePloS one2019

Phylogeography, genetic diversity, and population structure of Nile crocodile populations at the fringes of the southern African distribution.

Barbara van Asch, William F Versfeld, Kelvin L Hull, Alison J Leslie, Timoteus I Matheus, Petrus C Beytell, Pierre du Preez, Ruhan Slabbert, Clint Rhode

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Barbara van AschDepartment of Genetics, Stellenbosch University, Private Bag X1, Matieland, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0002-0171-879X
William F VersfeldDepartment of Genetics, Stellenbosch University, Private Bag X1, Matieland, South Africa.
Kelvin L HullDepartment of Genetics, Stellenbosch University, Private Bag X1, Matieland, South Africa.
Alison J LeslieDepartment of Conservation Ecology and Entomology, Stellenbosch University, Private Bag X1, Matieland, South Africa.
Timoteus I MatheusDirectorate of Scientific Services, Department of Natural Resources Management, Ministry of Environment & Tourism, Private Bag 13306, Windhoek, Namibia.ORCID 0000-0002-2045-083X
Petrus C BeytellDirectorate of Scientific Services, Department of Natural Resources Management, Ministry of Environment & Tourism, Private Bag 13306, Windhoek, Namibia.
Pierre du PreezDirectorate of Scientific Services, Department of Natural Resources Management, Ministry of Environment & Tourism, Private Bag 13306, Windhoek, Namibia.
Ruhan SlabbertDepartment of Genetics, Stellenbosch University, Private Bag X1, Matieland, South Africa.
Clint RhodeDepartment of Genetics, Stellenbosch University, Private Bag X1, Matieland, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0001-7969-7282

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nile crocodiles are apex predators widely distributed in sub-Saharan Africa that have been viewed and managed as a single species. A complex picture of broad and fine-scale phylogeographic patterns that includes the recognition of two species (Crocodylus niloticus and Crocodylus suchus), and the structuring of populations according to river basins has started to emerge. However, previous studies surveyed a limited number of samples and geographical regions, and large areas of the continent remained unstudied. This work aimed at a fine scale portrait of Nile crocodile populations at the fringes of their geographic distribution in southern Africa. Wild and captive individuals were sampled across four major river systems (Okavango, Lower Kunene, Lower Shire and Limpopo) and the KwaZulu-Natal region. A multi-marker approach was used to infer phylogeographic and genetic diversity patterns, including new and public mitochondrial data, and a panel of 11 nuclear microsatellites. All individuals belonged to a phylogenetic clade previously associated with the C. niloticus species, thus suggesting the absence of C. suchus in southern Africa. The distribution of mitochondrial haplotypes indicated ancestral genetic connectivity across large areas, with loss of diversity along the north-south axis. Genetic variation partitioned the populations primarily into western and eastern regions of southern Africa, and secondarily into the major river systems. Populations were partitioned into five main groups corresponding to the Lower Kunene, the Okavango, the Lower Shire, and the Limpopo rivers, and the KwaZulu-Natal coastal region. All groups show evidence of recent bottlenecks and small effective population sizes. Long-term genetic diversity is likely to be compromised, raising conservation concern. These results emphasize the need for local genetic assessment of wild populations of Nile crocodiles to inform strategies for management of the species in southern Africa.

Indexed as

Genetic VariationAfrica, SouthernAlligators and CrocodilesAnimalsDemographyDNA, MitochondrialHaplotypesMicrosatellite RepeatsPhylogenyPhylogeographyPopulation DensityRiversDNA, Mitochondrial

Identifiers

PMID31869351
PMCPMC6927622

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.