Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31869342›Full record

ArticlePloS one2019

Naïve/Effector CD4 T cell ratio as a useful predictive marker of immune reconstitution in late presenter HIV patients: A multicenter study.

Veronica Bordoni, Bruno Brando, Pierluca Piselli, Olindo Forini, Federico Enrico Perna, Umberto Atripaldi, Sara Carputo, Federica Garziano, Elisabetta Trento, Giovanna D'Agosto and 21 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Pathological Proliferation of CD4Infection and drug resistance · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Plant microRNAs fromFrontiers in pharmacology · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

31 authors.

Veronica BordoniINMI L. Spallanzani IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Bruno BrandoBlood Transfusion Center, Legnano General Hospital, Legnano, Italy.
Pierluca PiselliINMI L. Spallanzani IRCCS, Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-7342-0263
Olindo ForiniINMI L. Spallanzani IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Federico Enrico PernaDepartment of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.
Umberto AtripaldiDepartment of Clinical Biochemistry, Ospedali dei Colli, Naples, Italy.
Sara CarputoDepartment of Clinical Biochemistry, Ospedali dei Colli, Naples, Italy.
Federica GarzianoDepartment of Clinical Biochemistry, Ospedali dei Colli, Naples, Italy.
Elisabetta TrentoSan Gallicano Dermatological Institute IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Giovanna D'AgostoSan Gallicano Dermatological Institute IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Alessandra LatiniSan Gallicano Dermatological Institute IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Manuela ColafigliSan Gallicano Dermatological Institute IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Antonio CristaudoSan Gallicano Dermatological Institute IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Alessandra SacchiINMI L. Spallanzani IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Massimo AndreoniClinical Infectious Diseases, Department of System Medicine, University of Rome "Tor Vergata", Rome, Italy.
Gabriella De CarliClinical Department, INMI L Spallanzani IRCCS, Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-3972-8301
Nicoletta OrchiClinical Department, INMI L Spallanzani IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Sandro GrelliClinical Microbiology and Virology Unit, Department of Experimental Medicine, University of Rome "Tor Vergata", Rome, Italy.
Arianna GattiBlood Transfusion Center, Legnano General Hospital, Legnano, Italy.
Carlotta CervaGeneral Pathology and Immunology, Department of Biology, University of Rome "Tor Vergata", Rome, Italy.
Antonella MinutoloGeneral Pathology and Immunology, Department of Biology, University of Rome "Tor Vergata", Rome, Italy.
Marina PotestàGeneral Pathology and Immunology, Department of Biology, University of Rome "Tor Vergata", Rome, Italy.
Maria Luisa Di MartinoLaboratorio di Allergologia e Diagnostica dell'HIV della S.C. Medicina Interna, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy.
Francesco OrtuDipartimento di Medicina, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Cagliari, Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy.
Paola SelvaLaboratorio Unico Metropolitano (LUM), Azienda USL, Bologna, Italy.
Laura Del PupUOC Anatomia Patologica, Azienda ULSS2 Marca Trevigiana, Treviso, Italy.
Irene GuarnoriDepartment of Transfusion Medicine and Hematology, Azienda Ospedaliera della Provincia di Lecco, Alessandro Manzoni Hospital, Lecco, Italy.
Patrizia LorenziniClinical Department, INMI L Spallanzani IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Giusy CapuanoBecton Dickinson Italia, Milan, Italy.
Andrea AntinoriClinical Department, INMI L Spallanzani IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Chiara AgratiINMI L. Spallanzani IRCCS, Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5252-0927

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A significant proportion of HIV-infected patients experiencing a late diagnosis highlights the need to define immunological protocols able to help the clinicians in identifying patients at higher risk for immunological failure. The aim of the study was to evaluate the feasibility of easy cytometric tests in defining the effect of antiretroviral treatment (cART) on immunological homeostasis and in identifying predictive markers of early immune recovery. Chronic HIV infected patients (n = 202) were enrolled in a prospective multicentric study, and their immunological profile was studied before (w0) and after 24 weeks (w24) of antiretroviral treatment (cART) using a standardized flow cytometric panel. Based on CD4 T cell count before treatment, patients were divided in late (LP: CD4 <350/mmc), intermediate (IP: 350/mmc<CD4<500/mmc) and early (EP: CD4 >500/mmc) presenters. In all groups, cART introduction increased CD4 and CD4/CD8 T cell ratio, naïve T cell (CD4 and CD8) and CD127-expressing CD4 T cells. In parallel, cART significantly reduced effector memory T cells (CD4 and CD8) and T cell activation (CD38+CD8 and CD95+CD4 T cells). Moreover, the frequency of Naïve and Effector CD4 T cells before treatment correlated with several immune parameters key associated with the pathogenesis of HIV, thus mirroring the health of immune system. Interestingly, we identified the Naïve/Effector CD4 T cell ratio (N/EM) at w0 as a marker able to predict early immune recovery. Specifically, in LP, N/EM ratio was significantly higher in immunological responder patients (CD4>500/mmc at w24) when compared to immunological non responder (CD4 T cells <500/mmc at w24). Finally, a multivariate analysis indicates that after 24w patients with N/EM ratio higher than 1.86 at w0 recovered 96 CD4 T cells more than those with N/EM ratio lower than 0.46. Altogether, our data define an easy protocol able to define reliable immunological markers useful for the characterization of immune profile in viremic HIV patients and identify the naïve/effector CD4 T cell ratio as a new tool able to predict an early immune reconstitution potential.

Indexed as

Immune ReconstitutionAdultAnti-HIV AgentsAntiretroviral Therapy, Highly ActiveCD4 Lymphocyte CountCD4-Positive T-LymphocytesFemaleHIV InfectionsHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesTreatment OutcomeAnti-HIV Agents

Identifiers

PMID31869342
PMCPMC6927630

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.