ArticlePaediatric and perinatal epidemiology2020
The PRIDE Study: Evaluation of online methods of data collection.
Article in Paediatric and perinatal epidemiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.
- Development of the Gut Microbiota throughout the First Year of Life and Its Association with Socio-Emotional Development into Childhood.Developmental neuroscience · 2026Article
- Validity of Self-Reported Data on Postpartum Haemorrhage.BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology · 2026Article
- Measurement opportunities for studying sexual and gender diverse partnerships in population-based surveys.Journal of marriage and the family · 2024Article
- Recruitment and retention strategies to promote research engagement among caregivers and their children: A scoping review.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2024Article
- Associations of periconceptional oral contraceptive use with pregnancy complications and adverse birth outcomes.International journal of epidemiology · 2023Article
- Development and design of the BELpREG registration system for the collection of real-world data on medication use in pregnancy and mother-infant outcomes.Frontiers in drug safety and regulation · 2023Article
- Associations between maternal awakening salivary cortisol levels in mid-pregnancy and adverse birth outcomes.Archives of gynecology and obstetrics · 2022Article
- Online Assessment of Motor, Cognitive, and Communicative Achievements in 4-Month-Old Infants.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Associations Between Late-Onset Preeclampsia and the Use of Calcium-Based Antacids and Proton Pump Inhibitors During Pregnancy: A Prospective Cohort Study.Clinical epidemiology · 2022Article
- Accuracy of self-reported birth outcomes relative to birth certificate data in an Internet-based prospective cohort study.Paediatric and perinatal epidemiology · 2021Article
- Questionnaires and salivary cortisol to measure stress and depression in mid-pregnancy.PloS one · 2021Article
- The PRIDE Study: Evaluation of online methods of data collection.Paediatric and perinatal epidemiology · 2020Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundLarge birth cohort studies are extremely valuable in assessing associations between early life exposures and long-term outcomes. Establishing new birth cohorts is challenging due to declining participation rates. Online methods of data collection may increase feasibility, but have not been evaluated thoroughly.
objectiveThe primary objective of the ongoing PRegnancy and Infant DEvelopment (PRIDE) Study is to identify exposures during pregnancy and in early life that may affect short-term or long-term health of mother and/or child. In this manuscript, we aimed to evaluate methods of recruitment and online data collection applied. POPULATION: Dutch women aged ≥18 years in early pregnancy.
designProspective cohort study.
methodsInitially, only prenatal care providers recruited participants, but alternative recruitment methods were added as a result of disappointing participation rates, including collaboration with "Moeders voor Moeders" (organisation that visits women in early pregnancy) and Facebook advertisements. Data on demographic characteristics, obstetric history, maternal health, life style factors, occupational exposures, nutrition, pregnancy complications, and infant outcomes are primarily collected through Web-based questionnaires at multiple time points during and after pregnancy. Additional data collection components include paternal questionnaires, blood and saliva sampling, and linkage to medical records. PRELIMINARY
resultsBy September 2019, 9573 women were included in the PRIDE Study, of which 1.3% completed paper-based questionnaires. Mean age of the women analysed was 30.6 years, 71.1% had a high level of education, 57.2% were primiparae, and mean gestational age at enrolment was 9.9 (range 3, 37) weeks, with slight differences between recruitment methods. Pregnancy outcome was known for 89.8%. Retention rate at 6 months after the estimated date of delivery was estimated at 70%. Multiple validation studies conducted within the PRIDE Study indicated high data quality. CONCLUSION(S): Although challenging and time-consuming, online methods for recruitment and data collection may enable the establishment of new birth cohort studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.