ArticleJournal of vision2019
Motion perception in central field loss.
Article in Journal of vision, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Cue combination for depth perception in macular degeneration: Motion parallax augments disparity.Journal of vision · 2026Article
- Oculomotor challenges in macular degeneration impact motion extrapolation.Journal of vision · 2025Article
- Cancellation of the vestibulo-ocular reflex during smooth pursuit in patients with maculopathy.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Article
- Video-evoked neuromarkers of visual function in age-related macular degeneration.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2025Article
- Visual Field Dependence Persists in Age-Related Central Visual Field Loss.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2024Article
- Effect of expansive optic flow and lateral motion parallax on depth estimation with normal and artificially reduced acuity.Journal of vision · 2023Article
- Saccades during visual search in macular degeneration.Vision research · 2022Article
- Optic Flow Processing in Patients With Macular Degeneration.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2022Article
- Saccadic contributions to smooth pursuit in macular degeneration.Vision research · 2022Article
- Eye Movements in Macular Degeneration.Annual review of vision science · 2021Review
- Look where you go: Characterizing eye movements toward optic flow.Journal of vision · 2021Article
- Mapping the binocular scotoma in macular degeneration.Journal of vision · 2021Article
- Vision Impairment Provides New Insight Into Self-Motion Perception.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2021Article
- Eye, head, and gaze contributions to smooth pursuit in macular degeneration.Journal of neurophysiology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Motion information is essential in daily life because it provides cues to depth, timing, object identification, and self-motion, as well as input to the oculomotor system. As the peripheral visual field is exquisitely sensitive to motion, we investigated the periphery of individuals with central visual field loss (CFL) to determine whether speed and direction discrimination are intact in this population. We compared CFL participants' (N = 8), older (N = 6), and young controls' (N = 6) ability to discriminate motion speed and direction in a two-spatial-alternative forced-choice design. Participants viewed moving dots on the left and right of a fixation marker and judged which side had the faster speed or more clockwise direction. For the young control group, we repeated the experiment with the stimulus limited to thin strips of fixed width at eccentricities of 5°, 10°, and 15°. There was no significant difference in mean speed or direction discrimination thresholds of CFL participants and older controls for either velocity. Young controls had significantly lower thresholds than the CFL group for both tasks. We did not find an effect of visual acuity, viewing eccentricity, or scotoma location on individuals' ability to discriminate speed or direction. Our results indicate that for high-visibility stimuli moving at 5°-10°/s, speed and direction discrimination are intact in the periphery of individuals with CFL.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.