Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31868690›Full record

ArticleNeuroRehabilitation2019

Impact of motor therapy with dynamic body-weight support on Functional Independence Measures in traumatic brain injury: An exploratory study.

Emily Anggelis, Elizabeth Salmon Powell, Philip M Westgate, Amanda C Glueck, Lumy Sawaki

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NeuroRehabilitation, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04919161 (Unblinded Quasi-Randomized Pilot Study Exploring the Benefits of the ZeroG TRiP System to Improve Patient Balance Following an Acute Stroke), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04919161 nacompletednot on this map

Unblinded Quasi-Randomized Pilot Study Exploring the Benefits of the ZeroG TRiP System to Improve Patient Balance Following an Acute Stroke

TypeinterventionalSponsorGaylord Hospital, IncRan2019 to 2020Enrolled32ConditionsStroke, Balance, DistortedArmsBody weight support system control group, Body weight support system with balance perturbations
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Emily AnggelisUniversity of Kentucky, College of Medicine, Lexington, KY, USA.
Elizabeth Salmon PowellDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA.
Philip M WestgateDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Kentucky, College of Public Health, Lexington, KY, USA.
Amanda C GlueckDepartment of Neurology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA.
Lumy SawakiDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundContemporary goals of rehabilitation after traumatic brain injury (TBI) aim to improve cognitive and motor function by applying concepts of neuroplasticity. This can be challenging to carry out in TBI patients with motor, balance, and cognitive impairments.

objectiveTo determine whether use of dynamic body-weight support (DBWS) would allow safe administration of intensive motor therapy during inpatient rehabilitation and whether its use would yield greater improvement in functional recovery than standard-of-care (SOC) therapy in adults with TBI.

methodsData in this retrospective cohort study was collected from patients with TBI who receive inpatient rehabilitation incorporating DBWS (n = 6) and who received inpatient rehabilitation without DBWS (SOC, n = 6). The primary outcome measure was the change in Functional Independence Measures (FIM) scores from admission to discharge.

resultsThere was significant improvement in total FIM scores at discharge compared to admission for both the DBWS (p = 0.001) and SOC (p = 0.005) groups. Overall, the DBWS group had greater improvement in total FIM score and FIM subscales compared to the SOC group.

conclusionsOur results suggest DBWS has the potential to allow a greater intensity of therapy during inpatient rehabilitation and yield better outcomes compared to SOC in patients with TBI.

Indexed as

Orthotic DevicesAdultBrain Injuries, TraumaticFemaleHumansIndependent LivingInpatientsMaleMiddle AgedMovementNeurological RehabilitationPatient DischargeRecovery of Functionassistive technologyhumansinpatientneuroplasticityRehabilitationtrauma

Identifiers

PMID31868690
PMCPMC7029315

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.