ArticleJournal of abnormal psychology2020
Monitoring, assessing, and responding to suicide risk in clinical research.
Article in Journal of abnormal psychology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.
- Practices for monitoring and responding to incoming data on self-injurious thoughts and behaviors in intensive longitudinal studies: A systematic review.Clinical psychology review · 2021Pooled it
- The Prevalence and Incidence of Suicidal Thoughts and Behavior in a Smartphone-Delivered Treatment Trial for Body Dysmorphic Disorder: Cohort Study.JMIR mental health · 2025Trial
- A virtual, pilot randomized trial of a brief intervention to prevent suicide in an integrated healthcare setting.General hospital psychiatryTrial
- Balancing burden and resolution: Effects of EMA survey schedule on compliance and study evaluation in suicide-focused research.Journal of psychiatric research · 2026Article
- Suicide Risk Management in Ecological Momentary Assessment: Participant Concealment of Suicidal Thoughts and Experiences with Safety Procedures.Journal of affective disorders · 2026Article
- Do complex psychometric analyses really matter? Comparing multiple approaches using individual participant data from antidepressant trials.Psychological medicine · 2025Article
- 'Consider a Less Risky Alternative': Navigating Ethics Approval in Suicide Research.Journal of empirical research on human research ethics : JERHRE · 2025Review
- Suicide risk assessment and management protocol for research within the Department of Veterans Affairs.Journal of psychopathology and clinical science · 2025Article
- Ethical considerations for the use of ecological momentary assessment in non-suicidal self-injury research.Ethics & behavior · 2025Article
- Best practices for clinical trials of deep brain stimulation for neuropsychiatric indications.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2025Article
- Insights on suicide postvention for healthcare institutions in the Philippines: a health systems framework approach.Frontiers in psychology · 2025Article
- Suicidality among Youth in the Legal System: The Use of the Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale Screener.Evidence-based practice in child and adolescent mental health · 2024Article
- Hybrid 1 randomized controlled trial of an integrated stepped-care mental health intervention for traumatic injury patients.Contemporary clinical trials · 2024Article
- "I have some people who actually really care:" Young sexual minority women's lived experiences of non-suicidal self-injury disclosure.Qualitative research in medicine & healthcare · 2024Article
- Micro-sequences of anger and shame and non-suicidal self-injury in youth: an ecological momentary assessment study.Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines · 2024Article
- Suicide risk assessment and suicide risk management protocol for the Texas Youth Depression and Suicide Research Network.Contemporary clinical trials communications · 2023Article
- Revisiting Research Safety Protocols: The Urgency for Alternatives to Law Enforcement in Crisis Intervention.Psychiatric services (Washington, D.C.) · 2023Article
- Measurement-based care for suicidal youth: Outcomes and recommendations from the Services for Teens At Risk (STAR) Center.PloS one · 2023Article
- Responding to signals of mental and behavioral health risk in pragmatic clinical trials: Ethical obligations in a healthcare ecosystem.Contemporary clinical trials · 2022Article
- Looking for Razors and Needles in a Haystack: Multifaceted Analysis of Suicidal Declarations on Social Media-A Pragmalinguistic Approach.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
It is essential that investigators in clinical research settings follow ethical guidelines for monitoring, assessing, and responding to suicide risk. Given the unique considerations associated with suicide risk assessment in a research context, resources informing the development of research-specific suicide risk management procedures are needed. With decades of collective experience across heterogeneous contexts, we discuss approaches to monitoring, assessing, and responding to suicide risk as a function of study sample (e.g., students, psychiatric inpatients), data collection methodologies (e.g., interview, self-report, or ecological momentary assessment), and study design (e.g., treatment research). Additional considerations include training and supervision of staff to identify suicide risk, coordination of others to respond to risk, and documentation of procedures. Finally, we attend to the impact of these procedures on the external validity of outcome data. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.