Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31868154›Full record

ArticleThe Spanish journal of psychology2019

Cognitive Aging and Tests of Rationality.

Sanghyuk Park, Clintin P Davis-Stober, Hope K Snyder, William Messner, Michel Regenwetter

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Spanish journal of psychology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sanghyuk ParkUniversity of Missouri Columbia (USA).
Clintin P Davis-StoberUniversity of Missouri Columbia (USA).ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6836-6979
Hope K SnyderUniversity of Missouri Columbia (USA).
William MessnerThe Lubrizol Corporation (USA).
Michel RegenwetterUniversity of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign (USA).ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5607-9016

Funding

Pilot CoreP30AG023101 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS DALLAS · PI PARK, DENISE CORTIS · 2003 to 2008
$2.0M
Advanced Mathematical Modeling of Decision Making in Alcohol ResearchK25AA024182 · NIAAA · UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI-COLUMBIA · PI DAVIS-STOBER, CLINTIN PHILIP · 2016 to 2019
$590k
NIAAA NIH HHS K25 AA024182NIA NIH HHS P30 AG023101
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We investigated whether older adults are more likely than younger adults to violate a foundational property of rational decision making, the axiom of transitive preference. Our experiment consisted of two groups, older (ages 60-75; 21 participants) and younger (ages 18-30; 20 participants) adults. We used Bayesian model selection to investigate whether individuals were better described via (transitive) weak order-based decision strategies or (possibly intransitive) lexicographic semiorder decision strategies. We found weak evidence for the hypothesis that older adults violate transitivity at a higher rate than younger adults. At the same time, a hierarchical Bayesian analysis suggests that, in this study, the distribution of decision strategies across individuals is similar for both older and younger adults.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAge FactorsCognitive AgingDecision MakingFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedYoung Adultcognitive agingprobabilistic choicerandom preferencerational decision makingtransitivity of preference

Identifiers

PMID31868154
PMCPMC6994187

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.