SynthesisEvaluation & the health professions2021
Assessments of Research Competencies for Clinical Investigators: A Systematic Review.
Synthesis in Evaluation & the health professions, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Building capacity for patient-engagement in neuromuscular disease research: A network project.Journal of neuromuscular diseases · 2026Article
- MPOX transmission risks and biosafety protocols in laboratory animal research.Laboratory animal research · 2026Review
- Rethinking team science metrics through Collaborative Guideposts.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- Mentorship among healthcare researchers: a social network analysis.Frontiers in health services · 2025Article
- Scientific competence during medical education - insights from a cross-sectional study at a German Medical School.BMC medical education · 2024Article
- Article
- Learning Health Systems Research Competencies: A Survey of the Rehabilitation Research Community.Physical therapy · 2023Article
- Self-assessed Competencies of Clinical Research Professionals and Recommendations for Further Education and Training.Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science · 2022Article
- Research Education in Medical Curricula: a Global Analysis.Medical science educator · 2022Article
- The DIAMOND portal: An innovative platform for sharing translational research workforce training and assessment resources.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2020Article
- Attitudes, Experiences, and Barriers Toward Research Among Undergraduate Medical Students at the University of Dongola, Sudan.Journal of medical education and curricular developmentArticle
- An Assessment of Clinical Research Self-Efficacy among Researchers at the Largest Healthcare Institute in Qatar: Recommendations and Future Actions.Journal of medical education and curricular developmentArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Although there is extensive research literature on clinical skill competencies and the use of competency-based frameworks for clinical research, the appropriate methods to assess these competencies are not as well understood. Our goal in this systematic literature review is to identify, compare, and critique assessments of clinical research competencies. Articles were included in this review if they examined clinical investigators or clinical investigators in training, focused on research-based skills, and included some form of assessment of research-based competencies. A total of 76 articles were identified as part of the initial search; 16 met the criteria for inclusion. Two types of assessments of clinical research competence were identified: subjective self-assessments (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.