Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31867732›Full record

ArticleJournal of anatomy2020

Evolutionary trajectories of tooth histology patterns in modern sharks (Chondrichthyes, Elasmobranchii).

Patrick L Jambura, Julia Türtscher, René Kindlimann, Brian Metscher, Cathrin Pfaff, Sebastian Stumpf, Gerhard W Weber, Jürgen Kriwet

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of anatomy, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Patrick L JamburaDepartment of Palaeontology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-4765-5042
Julia TürtscherDepartment of Palaeontology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-8835-6129
René KindlimannHaimuseum und Sammlung R. Kindlimann, Aathal-Seegräben, Switzerland.
Brian MetscherDepartment of Theoretical Biology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-6514-4406
Cathrin PfaffDepartment of Palaeontology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0001-5539-2097
Sebastian StumpfDepartment of Palaeontology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-1945-2387
Gerhard W WeberDepartment of Evolutionary Anthropology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Jürgen KriwetDepartment of Palaeontology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-6439-8455
University of Vienna · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

During their evolutionary history, modern sharks developed different tooth mineralization patterns that resulted in very distinct histological patterns of the tooth crown (histotypes). To date, three different tooth histotypes have been distinguished: (i) orthodont teeth, which have a central hollow pulp cavity in the crown, encapsulated by a prominent layer of dentine (orthodentine); (ii) pseudoosteodont teeth, which have their pulp cavities secondarily replaced by a dentinal core of porous dentine (osteodentine), encased by orthodentine; and (iii) osteodont teeth, which lack orthodentine and the whole tooth crown of which consists of osteodentine. The aim of the present study was to trace evolutionary trends of tooth mineralization patterns in modern sharks and to find evidence for the presence of phylogenetic or functional signals. High resolution micro-computed tomography images were generated for the teeth of members of all nine extant shark orders and the putative stem group †Synechodontiformes, represented here by three taxa, to examine the tooth histology non-destructively. Pseudoosteodonty is the predominant state among modern sharks and represents unambiguously the plesiomorphic condition. Orthodonty evolved several times independently in modern sharks, while the osteodont tooth histotype is only developed in lamniform sharks. The two shark orders Heterodontiformes and Pristiophoriformes showed highly modified tooth histologies, with Pristiophorus exhibiting a histology only known from batomorphs (i.e. rays and skates), and Heterodontus showing a histological difference between anterior and posterior teeth, indicating a link between its tooth morphology, histology and durophagous lifestyle. The tooth histotype concept has proven to be a useful tool to reflect links between histology, function and its taxonomic value for distinct taxa; however, a high degree of variation, especially in the pseudoosteodont tooth histotype, demonstrates that the current histotype concept is too simplistic to fully resolve these relationships. The vascularization pattern of the dentine might offer new future research pathways for better understanding functional and phylogenetic signals in the tooth histology of modern sharks.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionDentitionAnimalsPhylogenySharksToothX-Ray Microtomographydentitionhistotypemicro-computed tomographyteethtooth histology

Identifiers

PMID31867732
PMCPMC7163786
OpenAlexW2995985721

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.