Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31867730›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of psychology : Journal international de psychologie2020

Examining the initial usability, acceptability and feasibility of a digital mental health intervention for college students in India.

Nitya Kanuri, Prerna Arora, Sai Talluru, Bona Colaco, Rohan Dutta, Abhimanyu Rawat, Barr C Taylor, M Manjula, Michelle G Newman

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of psychology : Journal international de psychologie, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 8 institutions in 2 countries.

Nitya KanuriSchool of Management & School of Public Health, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA.
Prerna AroraDepartment of Health and Behavioral Sciences, Teachers College, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.
Sai TalluruMichigan Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Bona ColacoDepartment of Psychology, Palo Alto University, Palo Alto, CA, USA.
Rohan DuttaElectrical and Electronics Engineering, BITS Pilani, Goa Campus, Goa, India.
Abhimanyu RawatComputer Science, BITS Pilani, Pilani Campus, Goa, India.
Barr C TaylorDepartment of Psychology, Palo Alto University, Palo Alto, CA, USA.
M ManjulaDepartment of Clinical Psychology, National Institute of Mental Health & Neuro Sciences (NIMHANS), Bengaluru, India.
Michelle G NewmanDepartment of Psychology, The Pennsylvania State University, State College, PA, USA.
Palo Alto University · USBirla Institute of Technology and Science, Pilani · INBirla Institute of Technology and Science, Pilani - Goa Campus · INColumbia University · USMichigan Medicine · USNational Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences · INPennsylvania State University · USYale University · US

Funding

Harnessing Mobile Technology to Reduce Mental Health Disorders in College PopulationsR01MH115128 · NIMH · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI EISENBERG, DANIEL, NEWMAN, MICHELLE G · 2018 to 2022
$4.1M
Birla Institute of Technology and Science, PilaniBITS Alumni Association, Stanford Behavioral Medicine LabNIMH NIH HHS R01 MH115128
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Generalised anxiety disorder (GAD) is prevalent among college students in India; however, barriers like stigma, treatment accessibility and cost prevent engagement in treatment. Web- and mobile-based, or digital, mental health interventions have been proposed as a potential solution to increasing treatment access. With the ultimate goal of developing an engaging digital mental health intervention for university students in India, the current study sought to understand students' reactions to a culturally and digitally adapted evidence-based cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) for GAD intervention. Specifically, through theatre testing and focus groups with a non-clinical sample of 15 college students in India, the present study examined initial usability, acceptability and feasibility of the "Mana Maali Digital Anxiety Program." Secondary objectives comprised identifying students' perceived barriers to using the program and eliciting recommendations. Results indicated high usability, with the average usability rating ranking in the top 10% of general usability scores. Participants offered actionable changes to improve usability and perceived acceptability among peers struggling with mental health issues. Findings highlight the benefits of offering digital resources that circumvent barriers associated with accessing traditional services. Results build on existing evidence that digital interventions can be a viable means of delivering mental healthcare to large, defined populations.

Indexed as

AdolescentAnxietyCognitive Behavioral TherapyFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansIndiaMaleMental HealthStudentsTelemedicineYoung AdultCognitive behavioural therapyCollege studentsDigital interventionsIndia

Identifiers

PMID31867730
PMCPMC7359910
OpenAlexW2998160616

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.