ArticleInternational journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care2019
Enhancing efficiency in a cardiac investigations department by increasing remote patient monitoring.
Article in International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.
- Expert Consensus Statement: Committee on Implantable Devices and Committee on Social Issues, Japanese Heart Rhythm Society (JHRS) Statement on Remote Monitoring of Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices.Journal of arrhythmia · 2026Article
- Remote Patient Monitoring and Connected Technologies in Inflammatory Bowel Disease.Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2025Article
- Article
- Touching Technology-Parents' Experiences of Remote Consultations for Children With Severe Congenital Cardiac Conditions: Quasi-Experimental Cohort Study.JMIR pediatrics and parenting · 2024Article
- 2023 HRS/EHRA/APHRS/LAHRS Expert Consensus Statement on Practical Management of the Remote Device Clinic.Journal of arrhythmia · 2023Article
- 2023 HRS/EHRA/APHRS/LAHRS Expert Consensus Statement on Practical Management of the Remote Device Clinic.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2023Article
- Remote Patient Monitoring: What Have We Learned and Where Are We Going?Current cardiovascular risk reports · 2023Review
- Telemedicine in Cardiology: Modern Technologies to Improve Cardiovascular Patients' Outcomes-A Narrative Review.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2022Review
- A Case Study of a Whole System Approach to Improvement in an Acute Hospital Setting.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- A Realist Inquiry to Identify the Contribution of Lean Six Sigma to Person-Centred Care and Cultures.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Article
- Reporting standards, outcomes and costs of quality improvement studies in Ireland: a scoping review.BMJ open quality · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveRemote monitoring (RM) of patients with cardiac rhythm management devices enables healthcare teams to effectively and efficiently monitor patients with heart problems without the requirement in-person patient visits. RM has been associated with safer and higher quality care but was not being used to its full potential in this setting. Cardiac rhythm management had observed an average implant rate of 295 devices per year over the past 13 years, resulting in a five-fold growth in patient follow-up in clinics. This increased demand was becoming unmanageable, with impacts on care quality. This study aimed to enhance the enrolment of eligible patients to RM.
designA pre-post design.
settingA 600-bed city centre teaching hospital in Dublin, Ireland.
participantsHospital staff and patients eligible for RM.
interventionsLean Six Sigma methods were used to develop patient education materials on RM and the clinic area was redesigned to enable RM enrolment and monitoring. MAIN OUTCOMES MEASURES: Number of unscheduled attendances to clinic and RM enrolment.
resultsAt baseline, the clinic was processing 102 RM follow-up checks with 140 unscheduled attendances on average per month. Following implementation, RM enrolment increased to 335 RM follow-up checks (194% increase), with 41 unscheduled attendances on average per month (70% decrease). These results were sustained one-year post-implementation.
conclusionsThese process changes have streamlined workflow by reducing the number of unscheduled attendances to clinic and increased the use of RM among the eligible patient population. This has meant safer, more timely responses to cardiac events and enhanced care quality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.