Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31867651›Full record

Trial reportNicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco2019

The Impact of Gradual and Immediate Nicotine Reduction on Subjective Cigarette Ratings.

Tracy T Smith, Eric C Donny, Xianghua Luo, Alicia M Allen, Dana M Carroll, Rachel L Denlinger-Apte, Sarah S Dermody, Joseph S Koopmeiners, F Joseph McClernon, Lauren R Pacek and 2 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Regulatory Approaches and Implementation of Minimally Addictive Combusted Products.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Effects of Reduced-Nicotine Cigarettes Across Regulatory Environments in the Experimental Tobacco Marketplace: A Randomized Trial.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2021
    Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Predictors of Adherence Among Vulnerable Populations of Adults Assigned to Smoke Very Low Nicotine Content Cigarettes.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2022
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Nicotine Standards in the United States.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Tracy T SmithHollings Cancer Center, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC.
Eric C DonnyBaptist Comprehensive Cancer Center, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, NC.
Xianghua LuoDivision of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN.
Alicia M AllenDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ.
Dana M CarrollMasonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN.
Rachel L Denlinger-ApteDepartment of Behavioral and Social Sciences, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, RI.
Sarah S DermodySchool of Psychological Science, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR.
Joseph S KoopmeinersDivision of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN.
F Joseph McClernonDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC.
Lauren R PacekDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC.
Ryan VandreyDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD.
Dorothy K HatsukamiMasonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN.
University of Minnesota · USAtrium Health Wake Forest Baptist · USDuke University · USBrown University · USJohns Hopkins University · USOregon State University · USUniversity of Arizona · US

Funding

Women's CancerP30CA077598 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA TWIN CITIES · PI Douglas Yee · 1998 to 2026
$100.4M
VERY LOW NICOTINE CIGARETTES IN SMOKERS WITH SCHIZOPHRENIAU54DA031659 · NIDA · WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI LE, CHAP T. · 2011 to 2022
$64.7M
Training in PharmacoNeuroImmune Substance Abuse ResearchT32DA007097 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA TWIN CITIES · PI MOLITOR, THOMAS WILLIAM · 1985 to 2021
$13.1M
Impact of e-cigarette characteristics on reinforcement and tobacco use patterns among current smokersK01DA047433 · NIDA · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI SMITH, TRACY TAYLOR · 2019 to 2023
$988k
Mobile health interventions for varenicline adherence among HIV-positive smokersK01DA043413 · NIDA · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI PACEK, LAUREN RENEE · 2017 to 2021
$860k
Assessing Tobacco Product Choice When the Cost of Menthol Cigarettes IncreasesR36DA045183 · NIDA · BROWN UNIVERSITY · PI DENLINGER-APTE, RACHEL · 2018 to 2019
$107k
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA077598NIDA NIH HHS K01 DA043413NIDA NIH HHS K01 DA047433NIDA NIH HHS R36 DA045183NIDA NIH HHS T32 DA007097NIDA NIH HHS U54 DA031659
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA recent clinical trial showed that an immediate transition to very low nicotine content (VLNC) cigarettes, compared with a gradual transition, produced greater reductions in smoking behavior, smoke exposure, and dependence. However, there was less compliance with the instruction to smoke only VLNC cigarettes in the immediate versus gradual reduction condition. The goal of this study was to test whether nicotine reduction method alters subjective ratings of VLNC cigarettes, and whether subjective ratings mediate effects of nicotine reduction method on smoking behavior, smoke exposure, dependence, and compliance.

methodsThis is a secondary analysis of a randomized trial conducted across 10 sites in the United States. Smokers (n = 1250) were randomized to either a control condition, or to have the nicotine content of their cigarettes reduced immediately or gradually to 0.04 mg nicotine/g of tobacco during a 20-week study period. Participants completed the modified Cigarette Evaluation Questionnaire (mCEQ).

resultsAfter Week 20, the immediate reduction group scored significantly lower than the gradual reduction group on multiple subscales of the mCEQ (ps < .001). The Satisfaction subscale of the mCEQ mediated the impact of nicotine reduction method on smoke exposure, smoking behavior, dependence, compliance, and abstinence. Other subscales also mediated a subset of these outcomes.

conclusionsAn immediate reduction in nicotine content resulted in lower product satisfaction than a gradual reduction, suggesting that immediate reduction further reduces cigarette reward value. This study will provide the Food and Drug Administration with information about the impact of nicotine reduction method on cigarette reward value. IMPLICATIONS: These data suggest that an immediate reduction in nicotine content will result in greater reductions in cigarette satisfaction than a gradual reduction, and this reduction in satisfaction is related to changes in smoking behavior and dependence.

Indexed as

NicotineSmokingHumansSmokersSmoking CessationTobacco ProductsNicotine

Identifiers

PMID31867651
PMCPMC6939762
OpenAlexW2998532188

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.