Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31867564›Full record

ArticleBMC rheumatology2019

Use of a "critical difference" statistical criterion improves the predictive utility of the Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index score in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

Frank Behrens, Michaela Koehm, Eva C Schwaneck, Marc Schmalzing, Holger Gnann, Gerd Greger, Hans-Peter Tony, Harald Burkhardt

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC rheumatology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01076205 (Long Term Documentation of the Safety and Efficacy as Well as the Effects on Quality of Life and Work Productivity in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis Under HUMIRA®), which is not on this map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01076205 completednot on this map

Long Term Documentation of the Safety and Efficacy as Well as the Effects on Quality of Life and Work Productivity in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis Under HUMIRA® (Adalimumab) in Routine Clinical Practice (AGIL)

TypeobservationalSponsorAbbVie (prior sponsor, Abbott)Ran2009 to 2017Enrolled7,229ConditionsRheumatoid Arthritis
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Frank Behrens *1Division of Rheumatology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Michaela Koehm *1Division of Rheumatology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Eva C Schwaneck3Schwerpunkt Rheumatologie/Klinische Immunologie Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik II, Universität Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Marc Schmalzing3Schwerpunkt Rheumatologie/Klinische Immunologie Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik II, Universität Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Holger GnannAbteilung Biostatistik, GKM Gesellschaft für Therapieforschung mbH, Munich, Germany.
Gerd Greger5AbbVie Deutschland GmbH & Co. KG, Wiesbaden, Germany.
Hans-Peter Tony *3Schwerpunkt Rheumatologie/Klinische Immunologie Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik II, Universität Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Harald Burkhardt *1Division of Rheumatology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6261-3131
Goethe University Frankfurt · DEUniversity of Würzburg · DEAbbVie (Germany) · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) is used to assess functional status in rheumatoid arthritis (RA), but the change required for meaningful improvements remains unclear. A minimum clinically important difference (MCID) of 0.22 is frequently used in RA trials. The aim of this study was to determine a statistically defined critical difference for HAQ-DI (HAQ-DI-d

methodsWe retrospectively analyzed data from adult German patients with RA enrolled in a multicenter observational trial in which they received adalimumab therapy at the decision of the treating clinician during routine clinical care. The HAQ-DI-d

resultsThe HAQ-DI-d

conclusionsA HAQ-DI-d

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT01076205. Registered on February 26, 2010 (retrospectively registered).

Indexed as

AdalimumabFunctional abilityHealth Assessment QuestionnaireRheumatoid arthritis

Identifiers

PMID31867564
PMCPMC6902502
OpenAlexW2995910690

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.