ArticlePractical laboratory medicine2019
Customisation and validation of a low-volume plasma renin activity immunoassay: Enabling of regulatory compliant determination in paediatric trials.
Article in Practical laboratory medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesInvestigations of plasma renin activity (PRA) in children are urgently required. Small-volume, regulatory guideline compliant, bioanalytical assays tailored for paediatric application could facilitate to overcome this hurdle. Ethical constraints given e.g. by the European Medicines Agency need to be addressed and reliable data generation in line with Good Clinical Laboratory Practice must be ensured.
methodsA PRA enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) was tailored for paediatric application and validated in the context of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration bioanalytical guideline. Performance verification of the assay was conducted by participation in an interlaboratory ring test, evaluation of incurred sample reanalysis and an application-orientated approach in children.
resultsA five-fold reduction of required plasma volume to 100 μL was achieved without limiting the calibration range. Between-run accuracy and precision varied no more than 5.0% and 6.3%, respectively. No substantial matrix effect was detected and the inter-run precision for parallelism was 11.1%. Stability experiments approved the freeze-thaw stability, short-term stability as well as 37 weeks of long-term stability. The assay successfully participated in the interlaboratory ring test, showing non-inferiority regarding radioimmunoassay (RIA). Moreover, PRA in plasma samples of neonates was successfully determined. Conducted incurred sample reanalysis confirmed the comparability and reliability of the assay with regard to international regulatory bioanalytical guidelines.
conclusionA fit-for-purpose PRA ELISA characterised by low-volume application was successfully established, indicating non-inferiority regarding commonly applied RIAs. Reliability of the regulatory-compliant PRA assay was proven by participation in an interlaboratory ring test and its application in a paediatric population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.