ReviewFrontiers in medicine2019
New Frontiers for Molecular Pathology.
Review in Frontiers in medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed.
- Elucidating adverse drug reactions and underlying molecular mechanisms of ivermectin through pharmacovigilance and multi-omics analysis.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Article
- Article
- Laboratory Practices, Potentiality, and Material Patienthood in Genomic Cancer Medicine.Science, technology & human values · 2024Article
- PERP May Affect the Prognosis of Lung Adenocarcinoma by Inhibiting Apoptosis.Cancer management and research · 2024Article
- The prognostic value of tumor mutation burden (TMB) and its relationship with immune infiltration in breast cancer patients.European journal of medical research · 2023Article
- Review
- Estrogens, Cancer and Immunity.Cancers · 2022Review
- Development of a Clinical Prognostic Model for Metabolism-Related Genes in Squamous Lung Cancer and Correlation Analysis of Immune Microenvironment.BioMed research international · 2022Article
- PD-L1 Dependent Immunogenic Landscape in Hot Lung Adenocarcinomas Identified by Transcriptome Analysis.Cancers · 2021Article
- Biomarkers and Gene Signatures to Predict Durable Response to Pembrolizumab in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.Cancers · 2021Article
- Review
- Construction of the optimization prognostic model based on differentially expressed immune genes of lung adenocarcinoma.BMC cancer · 2021Article
- Editorial: New Advances in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Management: Immune Modulation and Targeted Therapies.Frontiers in medicine · 2021Article
- Clinical Implications of Exosomal PD-L1 in Cancer Immunotherapy.Journal of immunology research · 2021Review
- Liquid Biopsy is Instrumental for 3PM Dimensional Solutions in Cancer Management.Journal of clinical medicine · 2020Review
- Primary Driver Mutations inCancers · 2020Article
- Article
- Alveolar macrophages in patients with non-small cell lung cancer.International journal of clinical and experimental pathology · 2020Article
- Tumor-Derived Exosomes in Immunosuppression and Immunotherapy.Journal of immunology research · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Lung cancer remains a serious oncological problem worldwide. The delayed diagnosis and a prevalence of advanced stages in up to 70% of cases at recognition are still observed. Thanks to targeted therapies and immunotherapy a significant progress in achieving prolonged survival in some lung cancer patients is reported. A precise histopathological diagnosis, especially the recognition of adenocarcinoma, and a progress in the methods of clinical staging underlie the proper qualification of patients for a tailored therapy. The deep molecular characteristics of lung cancer in liquid biopsy, for example blood, bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF), cell suspension from needle aspirates, are currently available. The molecular characteristic has recently been extended with molecular aberrations of BRAF, KRAS, MET, ERBB2, RET, NTRK next to the well-known EGFR mutations and ALK, ROS-1 relocation. The present paper discusses the usefulness of adequate pathological methods and molecular testing for the identification of a broad spectrum of predictive biomarkers for a molecular-directed lung cancer therapy. Immunotherapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) is approved in the first line therapy of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. To date only PD-L1 expression on tumor cells has been found to be a marker of response to ICIs. The efficacy of ICIs as well as the susceptibility to immune-related adverse events are highly individual, so immune biomarkers are widely investigated. The candidates for predictive factors for ICIs immunotherapy include cancer cell antigenicity, presence of regulatory/suppressory molecules on cancer cells, cancer stem cells or on exosomes, and, on the other hand, an immune status of the patient. Cancers with high immune infiltration in the tumor milieu, referred to as "hot" tumors, seem to ensure a better response to ICIs than the "cold" ones. BALF analysis may replace cancer tissue examination, which is of limited access in advanced stages, for the recognition of the nature of immune response in the tumor environment. Tumor mutational burden (TMB) was shown to correlate with a good response to ICIs, especially when combined with other anticancer therapies. The present paper demonstrates the results of recent studies on lung cancer characteristics which bring us closer to the definition of useful prognostic/predictive factors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.