Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31867136›Full record

SynthesisTremor and other hyperkinetic movements (New York, N.Y.)2019

Tremor Control Devices for Essential Tremor: A Systematic Literature Review.

Victoria Castrillo-Fraile, Elena Casas Peña, José María Trejo Gabriel Y Galán, Pedro David Delgado-López, Carla Collazo, Esther Cubo

Open access · greenAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Tremor and other hyperkinetic movements (New York, N.Y.), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Shaking Up Essential Tremor: Peripheral Devices and Mechanical Strategies to Reduce Tremor.Tremor and other hyperkinetic movements (New York, N.Y.) · 2024
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. The Conundrum of Dystonia in Essential Tremor Patients: How does One Classify these Cases?Tremor and other hyperkinetic movements (New York, N.Y.) · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Author Response to Letter to the Editor.Tremor and other hyperkinetic movements (New York, N.Y.) · 2020
    Article
  11. The Validation of Tremor-Cancelling Technologies Needs a Multidisciplinary Consensus Statement.Tremor and other hyperkinetic movements (New York, N.Y.) · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Victoria Castrillo-FraileDepartment of Rehabilitation, Burgos University Hospital, Burgos, ES.
Elena Casas PeñaDepartment of Neurology, Burgos University Hospital, Burgos, ES.
José María Trejo Gabriel Y GalánDepartment of Neurology, Burgos University Hospital, Burgos, ES.
Pedro David Delgado-LópezDepartment of Neurosurgery, Burgos University Hospital, Burgos, ES.
Carla CollazoDepartment of Health Science, University of Burgos, Burgos, ES.
Esther CuboDepartment of Neurology, Burgos University Hospital, Burgos, ES.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: There is a growing interest in nonpharmacological approaches for essential tremor (ET), including tremor cancelation devices. However, the true efficacy of such devices in ET remains unclear. Methods: A systematic literature review was conducted using standardized criteria regarding efficacy and comfortability. Devices focused on design or experimental testing in which tremor was simulated in a robot were excluded. Results: Out of 324 articles initially identified, 12 articles were included. Orthoses using biomechanical loading and neuromodulation with electrical stimulation, and external tremor cancelation devices, were the main interventions used to suppress tremor. All devices were designed to control tremor of the upper limbs at different anatomical locations. Overall, an average tremor attenuation of 50-98% was reported (level of evidence III). Interference with voluntary movements and portability was described as the main drawback. Discussion: In conclusion, this review highlights the growing interest in emerging tremor control devices and the importance of assessing comfort without affecting voluntary movements. However, the level of evidence regarding the efficacy of these tremor control devices remains low. An integrated multidisciplinary combination approach of engineering, robotics, physiology, physiotherapy, and clinical assessment is needed to improve the quality of non-pharmacological interventions for ET.

Indexed as

Essential TremorExoskeleton DeviceHumansOrthotic DevicesTranscutaneous Electric Nerve StimulationdevicesEssential tremorneuroprosthesisorthosisupper limbvoluntary movement

Identifiers

PMID31867136
PMCPMC6898897
OpenAlexW2997952108

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.