Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31867117›Full record

ArticleContraception and reproductive medicine2019

Ovulation rates in a stair-step protocol with Letrozole vs clomiphene citrate in patients with polycystic ovarian syndrome.

S Thomas, I Woo, J Ho, T Jones, R Paulson, K Chung, K Bendikson

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Contraception and reproductive medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06486870 (Comparative Study Between Two Ovulation Induction Therapies and Laparoscopic Ovarian Drilling on Clinical Outcomes in Clomiphene Citrate-Resistant PCOS Women), which is not on this map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06486870 phase3completednot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

Comparative Study Between Two Ovulation Induction Therapies and Laparoscopic Ovarian Drilling on Clinical Outcomes in Clomiphene Citrate-Resistant PCOS Women

TypeinterventionalSponsorCairo UniversityRan2020 to 2024Enrolled183ConditionsPCOS (Polycystic Ovary Syndrome) of Bilateral OvariesArmsGonadotropin, Letrozole, laparoscopic ovarian drilling
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Letrozole and clomiphene versus letrozole alone for ovulation induction in women with PCOS: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia · 2025
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

S ThomasUniversity of Southern California, 2020 Zonal Avenue, IRD 534, California, Los Angeles 90033 USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8895-2561
I WooUniversity of Southern California, 2020 Zonal Avenue, IRD 534, California, Los Angeles 90033 USA.
J HoUniversity of Southern California, 2020 Zonal Avenue, IRD 534, California, Los Angeles 90033 USA.
T JonesUniversity of Southern California, 2020 Zonal Avenue, IRD 534, California, Los Angeles 90033 USA.
R PaulsonUniversity of Southern California, 2020 Zonal Avenue, IRD 534, California, Los Angeles 90033 USA.
K ChungUniversity of Southern California, 2020 Zonal Avenue, IRD 534, California, Los Angeles 90033 USA.
K BendiksonUniversity of Southern California, 2020 Zonal Avenue, IRD 534, California, Los Angeles 90033 USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo compare ovulation rates between Letrozole and Clomiphene Citrate (CC) using a stair-step protocol to achieve ovulation induction in women with Polycystic Ovarian Syndrome (PCOS).

methodsThis is a retrospective cohort of predominantly Hispanic PCOS women of reproductive age who completed ovulation induction (OI) comparing women who underwent Letrozole stair-step protocol to those who underwent OI with CC stair-step. All women had a diagnosis of PCOS based on the 2003 Rotterdam criteria. For both protocols, sequentially higher doses of Letrozole or CC were given 7 days after the last dose if no dominant follicles were seen on ultrasonography. The primary outcome was ovulation rate (determined by presence of a dominant follicle) between the two treatment groups. Secondary outcomes included time to ovulation, clinical pregnancy rates and side effects.

results49 PCOS patients completed a Letrozole stair-step cycle and 43 completed a CC stair-step cycle for OI. Overall, demographics were comparable between both groups. Ovulation rates with the Letrozole stair-step protocol were equivalent to CC stair-step protocol (96% vs 88%,

conclusionsThis is the first study to date that has compared the efficacy of the stair-step protocol in PCOS patients using Letrozole and CC. Both Letrozole and CC can be prescribed in a stair-step fashion. Letrozole stair-step was as efficacious as CC stair-step; patients achieved comparable rates of ovulation and clinical pregnancy. Time to ovulation was shorter in the Letrozole protocol.

Identifiers

PMID31867117
PMCPMC6900839

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.