ArticleBiomicrofluidics2019
Enabling single cell electrical stimulation and response recording via a microfluidic platform.
Article in Biomicrofluidics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Microfluidic platforms for monitoring cardiomyocyte electromechanical activity.Microsystems & nanoengineering · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Electrical stimulation (ES) has been recognized to play important roles in regulating cell behaviors. A microfluidic device was developed for the electrical stimulation of single cells and simultaneous recording of extracellular field potential (EFP). Each single cell was trapped onto an electrode surface by a constriction channel for ES testing and was then driven to the outlet by the pressure afterward. This design allows the application of ES on and detection of EFP of single cells continuously in a microfluidic channel. Human cardiomyocytes and primary rat cortex neurons were tested with specific ES with the device. Each cell's EFP signal was detected and analyzed during the ES process. Results have shown that after applying specific ES on the excitable single cells, the cells evoked electrical responses. In addition, increased secretion of glutamic acid was detected from the stimulated neurons. Altogether, these results indicated that the developed device can be used to continuously apply ES on and accurately determine cell responses of single cells with shorter probing time. The throughput of the measurement can achieve 1 cell per minute, which is higher than the traditional ES methods that need culturing cells or manually positioning the cells onto the electrode surface. Before and after the application of ES, the cell viability had no significant change. Such a device can be used to study the biological process of various types of cells under electrical stimulation.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.