Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31867063›Full record

ReviewInterventional cardiology (London, England)2019

The Value of Intracoronary Imaging and Coronary Physiology When Treating Calcified Lesions.

Yasushi Ueki, Tatsuhiko Otsuka, Kiyoshi Hibi, Lorenz Räber

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Interventional cardiology (London, England), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Super high-pressure balloon versus scoring balloon to prepare severely calcified coronary lesions: the ISAR-CALC randomised trial.EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2021
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Coronary calcifications, the Achilles heel in coronary interventions.Postepy w kardiologii interwencyjnej = Advances in interventional cardiology · 2024
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Yasushi UekiDepartment of Cardiology, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern Bern, Switzerland.
Tatsuhiko OtsukaDepartment of Cardiology, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern Bern, Switzerland.
Kiyoshi HibiDivision of Cardiology, Yokohama City University Medical Centre Yokohama, Japan.
Lorenz RäberDepartment of Cardiology, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern Bern, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Heavily calcified coronary artery lesions hinder the delivery of devices and limit stent expansion, resulting in low procedural success and poor clinical outcomes driven by an increase in restenosis and stent thrombosis. Intracoronary imaging provides a more precise assessment of lesions and is a critical step when deciding whether the lesion needs to be prepared with atherectomy devices. Physiological assessment of lesion significance is an important consideration to avoid unnecessary stenting. This article summarises the current data on the value of intracoronary imaging and functional assessment for coronary calcified lesions and suggests a treatment strategy based on the findings of intracoronary imaging findings.

Indexed as

Calcified lesionfractional flow reserveintravascular ultrasoundoptical coherence tomographyrotablation

Identifiers

PMID31867063
PMCPMC6918501

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.