ArticleFrontiers in genetics2019
Characterization of Human Dosage-Sensitive Transcription Factor Genes.
Article in Frontiers in genetics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Nonlinearities and Switch-Like Behavior in Gene Expression: From Genetics to Biochemistry and Back.FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology · 2026Review
- CoxFormer enables spatial omics inference with multimodal generative modeling.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Assessing scale and predictive diversity in models for single-cell transcriptomics based on Geneformer.PLoS computational biology · 2026Article
- Scaling and quantization of large-scale foundation model enables resource-efficient predictions in network biology.Nature computational science · 2026Article
- Many roads lead to a plant cistrome: mapping and interpreting transcription factor binding in plants.Genome biology · 2026Review
- Mismatch tolerance of a gRNA for CRISPR-based gene activation confers broad activity critical for cell reprogramming.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- scKGBERT: a knowledge-enhanced foundation model for single-cell transcriptomics.Genome biology · 2025Article
- An automated ATAC-seq method reveals sequence determinants of transcription factor dose response in the open chromatin.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Comparative modeling reveals the molecular determinants of aneuploidy fitness cost in a wild yeast model.Cell genomics · 2024Article
- Mendelian inheritance revisited: dominance and recessiveness in medical genetics.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2023Review
- Article
- Krüppel-like factor 6-mediated loss of BCAA catabolism contributes to kidney injury in mice and humans.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021Article
- Integration of Data from Liquid-Liquid Phase Separation Databases Highlights Concentration and Dosage Sensitivity of LLPS Drivers.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Article
- Of numbers and movement - understanding transcription factor pathogenesis by advanced microscopy.Disease models & mechanisms · 2020Review
- Characterization of Human Dosage-Sensitive Transcription Factor Genes.Frontiers in genetics · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Copy number changes in protein-coding genes are detrimental if the consequent changes in protein concentrations disrupt essential cellular functions. The dosage sensitivity of transcription factor (TF) genes is particularly interesting because their products are essential in regulating the expression of genetic information. From four recently curated data sets of dosage-sensitive genes (genes with conserved copy numbers across mammals, ohnologs, and two data sets of haploinsufficient genes), we compiled a data set of the most reliable dosage-sensitive (MRDS) genes and a data set of the most reliable dosage-insensitive (MRDIS) genes. The MRDS genes were those present in all four data sets, while the MRDIS genes were those absent from any one of the four data sets and with the probability of being loss of function-intolerant (pLI) values < 0.5 in both of the haploinsufficient gene data sets. Enrichment analysis of TF genes among the MRDS and MRDIS gene data sets showed that TF genes are more likely to be dosage-sensitive than other genes in the human genome. The nuclear receptor family was the most enriched TF family among the dosage-sensitive genes. TF families with very few members were also deemed more likely to be dosage-sensitive than TF families with more members. In addition, we found a certain number of dosage-insensitive TFs. The most typical were the Krüppel-associated box domain-containing zinc-finger proteins (KZFPs). Gene ontology (GO) enrichment analysis showed that the MRDS TFs were enriched for many more terms than the MRDIS TFs; however, the proteins interacting with these two groups of TFs did not show such sharp differences. Furthermore, we found that the MRDIS KZFPs were not significantly enriched for any GO terms, whereas their interacting proteins were significantly enriched for thousands of GO terms. Further characterizations revealed significant differences between MRDS TFs and MRDIS TFs in the lengths and nucleotide compositions of DNA-binding sites as well as in expression level, protein size, and selective force.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.