Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31867031›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2019

Distinct Metabolic Signals Underlie Clone by Environment Interplay in "Nebbiolo" Grapes Over Ripening.

Chiara Pagliarani, Paolo Boccacci, Walter Chitarra, Emanuela Cosentino, Marco Sandri, Irene Perrone, Alessia Mori, Danila Cuozzo, Luca Nerva, Marzia Rossato and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Long-Term Impact of Chemical and Alternative Fungicides Applied to GrapevineInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Chiara PagliaraniInstitute for Sustainable Plant Protection, National Research Council (IPSP-CNR), Torino, Italy.
Paolo BoccacciInstitute for Sustainable Plant Protection, National Research Council (IPSP-CNR), Torino, Italy.
Walter ChitarraInstitute for Sustainable Plant Protection, National Research Council (IPSP-CNR), Torino, Italy.
Emanuela CosentinoDepartment of Biotechnology, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Marco SandriDMS StatLab, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy.
Irene PerroneInstitute for Sustainable Plant Protection, National Research Council (IPSP-CNR), Torino, Italy.
Alessia MoriDepartment of Biotechnology, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Danila CuozzoInstitute for Sustainable Plant Protection, National Research Council (IPSP-CNR), Torino, Italy.
Luca NervaInstitute for Sustainable Plant Protection, National Research Council (IPSP-CNR), Torino, Italy.
Marzia RossatoDepartment of Biotechnology, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Paola ZuccolottoBig&Open Data Innovation Laboratory, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy.
Mario PezzottiDepartment of Biotechnology, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Massimo DelledonneDepartment of Biotechnology, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Franco ManniniInstitute for Sustainable Plant Protection, National Research Council (IPSP-CNR), Torino, Italy.
Ivana GribaudoInstitute for Sustainable Plant Protection, National Research Council (IPSP-CNR), Torino, Italy.
Giorgio GambinoInstitute for Sustainable Plant Protection, National Research Council (IPSP-CNR), Torino, Italy.
University of Verona · ITInstitute for Sustainable Plant Protection · ITNational Research Council · ITUniversity of Brescia · ITCereal Research Centre · ITUniversity of Turin · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Several research studies were focused to understand how grapevine cultivars respond to environment; nevertheless, the biological mechanisms tuning this phenomenon need to be further deepened. Particularly, the molecular processes underlying the interplay between clones of the same cultivar and environment were poorly investigated. To address this issue, we analyzed the transcriptome of berries from three "Nebbiolo" clones grown in different vineyards, during two ripening seasons. RNA-sequencing data were implemented with analyses of candidate genes, secondary metabolites, and agronomical parameters. This multidisciplinary approach helped to dissect the complexity of clone × environment interactions, by identifying the molecular responses controlled by genotype, vineyard, phenological phase, or a combination of these factors. Transcripts associated to sugar signalling, anthocyanin biosynthesis, and transport were differently modulated among clones, according to changes in berry agronomical features. Conversely, genes involved in defense response, such as stilbene synthase genes, were significantly affected by vineyard, consistently with stilbenoid accumulation. Thus, besides at the cultivar level, clone-specific molecular responses also contribute to shape the agronomic features of grapes in different environments. This reveals a further level of complexity in the regulation of genotype × environment interactions that has to be considered for orienting viticultural practices aimed at enhancing the quality of grape productions.

Indexed as

candidate gene expressionclonesRNA-seqsecondary metabolismsugar signallingVitis vinifera

Identifiers

PMID31867031
PMCPMC6904956
OpenAlexW2994012848

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.