Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31867022›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in plant science2019

The Origin and Diversification of the Hyperdiverse Flora in the Chocó Biogeographic Region.

Oscar Alejandro Pérez-Escobar, Eve Lucas, Carlos Jaramillo, Alexandre Monro, Sarah K Morris, Diego Bogarín, Deborah Greer, Steven Dodsworth, José Aguilar-Cano, Andrea Sanchez Meseguer and 1 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in plant science, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. PhytoKeys · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. A new cherry species (PhytoKeys · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  13. Exploring the Potential of Extracts fromPharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  14. Identification of the NAJournal of chemical ecology · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Oscar Alejandro Pérez-EscobarComparative Plant and Fungal Biology Department, Royal Botanic Gardens Kew, London, United Kingdom.
Eve LucasComparative Plant and Fungal Biology Department, Royal Botanic Gardens Kew, London, United Kingdom.
Carlos JaramilloSmithsonian Tropical Research Institute, Panama, Panama.
Alexandre MonroComparative Plant and Fungal Biology Department, Royal Botanic Gardens Kew, London, United Kingdom.
Sarah K MorrisComparative Plant and Fungal Biology Department, Royal Botanic Gardens Kew, London, United Kingdom.
Diego BogarínUniversidad de Costa Rica, Jardín Botánico Lankester, Cartago, Costa Rica.
Deborah GreerComparative Plant and Fungal Biology Department, Royal Botanic Gardens Kew, London, United Kingdom.
Steven DodsworthSchool of Life Sciences, University of Bedfordshire, Luton, United Kingdom.
José Aguilar-CanoResearch Institute Alexander von Humboldt, Bogota, Colombia.
Andrea Sanchez MeseguerReal Jardín Botánico de Madrid (RJB-CSIC), Madrid, Spain.
Alexandre AntonelliComparative Plant and Fungal Biology Department, Royal Botanic Gardens Kew, London, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Extremely high levels of plant diversity in the American tropics are derived from multiple interactions between biotic and abiotic factors. Previous studies have focused on macro-evolutionary dynamics of the Tropical Andes, Amazonia, and Brazil's Cerrado and Atlantic forests during the last decade. Yet, other equally important Neotropical biodiversity hotspots have been severely neglected. This is particularly true for the Chocó region on the north-western coast of South and Central America. This geologically complex region is Earth's ninth most biodiverse hotspot, hosting approximately 3% of all known plant species. Here, we test Gentry's [1982a,b] hypothesis of a northern Andean-Central American Pleistocene origin of the Chocoan flora using phylogenetic reconstructions of representative plant lineages in the American tropics. We show that plant diversity in the Chocó is derived mostly from Andean immigrants. Contributions from more distant biogeographical areas also exist but are fewer. We also identify a strong floristic connection between the Chocó and Central America, revealed by multiple migrations into the Chocó during the last 5 Ma. The dated phylogenetic reconstructions suggest a Plio-Pleistocene onset of the extant Chocó flora. Taken together, these results support to a limited extend Gentry's hypothesis of a Pleistocene origin and of a compound assembly of the Chocoan biodiversity hotspot. Strong Central American-Chocoan floristic affinity may be partly explained by the accretion of a land mass derived from the Caribbean plate to north-western South America. Additional densely sampled phylogenies of Chocoan lineages also well represented across the Neotropics could enlighten the role of land mass movements through time in the assembly of floras in Neotropical biodiversity hotspots.

Indexed as

Andean upliftbiogeographyCentral AmericaChocóhyper-diversitymacroevolutionneotropical region

Identifiers

PMID31867022
PMCPMC6910151

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.