ArticleOccupational therapy international2019
Psychometric Properties of Sensory Processing and Self-Regulation Checklist (SPSRC).
Article in Occupational therapy international, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.
- Proxy-reported sensory measures for children and adolescents with neurodevelopmental disorders: A systematic review.Developmental medicine and child neurology · 2023Pooled it
- HD-tDCS effects on social impairment in autism spectrum disorder with sensory processing abnormalities: a randomized controlled trial.Scientific reports · 2025Trial
- A Trans-Diagnostic Investigation of Attention and Diverse Phenotypes of "Auditory Hyperreactivity" in Autism, ADHD, and the General Population.Journal of attention disorders · 2026Article
- Exploring self-regulation deficits in sensory over-responsivity disorder: A preschool comparative analysis.Global mental health (Cambridge, England) · 2025Article
- Sensory Phenomenon Assessment Scale: a new tool for assessment of tic-associated sensations.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2024Article
- Exploring Co-Regulation-Related Factors in the Mothers of ADHD Children-Proof of Concept Study.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Psychometric Properties of the Italian Version of Sensory Processing and Self-Regulation Checklist (SPSRC).Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Interventions for Sensory Over-Responsivity in Individuals with Autism Spectrum Disorder: A Narrative Review.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Development of Thai Sensory Patterns Assessment Tool for Children Aged 3-12 Years: Caregiver-Version.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Psychometric Properties of the Sensory Processing and Self-Regulation Checklist: English Version.Occupational therapy international · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSome children may encounter difficulties in processing sensory stimuli, which may affect their ability to participate in activities of daily living. Self-regulation abilities may also affect children on how to process different sensory experiences. The Sensory Processing and Self-Regulation Checklist (SPSRC) was developed as a single, parent-reported instrument for the examination of sensory processing and self-regulation difficulties in children.
aimsThis study is aimed at evaluating the psychometric properties of the SPSRC and examine the patterns of self-regulation and sensory processing in children with and without autism spectrum disorder (ASD). METHODS AND PROCEDURES: The contents of the SPSRC were validated by a group of experts, and a field test was subsequently conducted to examine the reliability and validity of this instrument in a sample of 997 typically developing children and 78 children with ASD. OUTCOMES AND
resultsThe results of the validation and field test analyses suggest that the SPSRC exhibits high internal consistency, good intrarater reliability, and a valid ability to measure and discriminate sensory processing and self-regulation in children aged 3-8 years with and without ASD. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: The current results supported the reliability and validity of SPSRC to assess a child's sensory processing and self-regulation performance in activities of daily living. The study findings warrant further investigation to compare the performance of the SPSRC with laboratory-based tests, as this would better elucidate sensory responsivity in children with sensory modulation disorders from both clinical and research perspectives.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.