Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31866589›Full record

ArticleProgress in community health partnerships : research, education, and action2019

Toward Health Equity: A National Study of Promising Practices in Community-Based Participatory Research.

Bonnie Duran, John Oetzel, Maya Magarati, Myra Parker, Chuan Zhou, Yvette Roubideaux, Michael Muhammad, Cynthia Pearson, Lorenda Belone, Sarah Hicks Kastelic and 1 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Progress in community health partnerships : research, education, and action, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
12.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 74 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. SOARNet: Establishing an older adult focused practice-based research network.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Bonnie Duran
John Oetzel
Maya Magarati
Myra Parker
Chuan Zhou
Yvette Roubideaux
Michael Muhammad
Cynthia Pearson
Lorenda Belone
Sarah Hicks Kastelic
Nina Wallerstein

Funding

Tribal Colleges and Universities Behavior Wellness Study (TCU-BeWell)R01AA022068 · NIAAA · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI DURAN, BONNIE M · 2013 to 2017
$3.2M
Family Listening Program: Multi-Tribal Implementation and EvaluationR01DA037174 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO HEALTH SCIS CTR · PI BELONE, LORENDA, WALLERSTEIN, NINA B · 2014 to 2018
$3.0M
Enhancing CBPR Practice through Provision of Expert Information SkillsR01NR015241 · NINR · UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO HEALTH SCIS CTR · PI WALLERSTEIN, NINA B · 2015 to 2019
$2.7M
CBPR with Tribal Colleges-Universities: Alcohol Problems-SolutionsR01DA029001 · NIDA · NORTHWEST INDIAN COLLEGE · PI DURAN, BONNIE M · 2009 to 2012
$655k
NIAAA NIH HHS R01 AA022068NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA029001NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA037174NINR NIH HHS R01 NR015241
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesIn the first nationwide study of community- academic research partnerships, we identified contextual and partnership practices that were significantly correlated with successful partnership outcomes guided by a community-based participatory research (CBPR) conceptual model.

methodsData collection included three stages: 294 community-engaged research (CEnR) projects in 2009 identified from federally funded grant databases; 200 (68.0%) principal investigators (PI) completed a key informant survey that included measures of power/resource sharing and structural characteristics of projects; 312 (77.2% of invited) community partners and 138 PI (69.0% of invited) responded to a survey including research context, process, and outcome measures.

resultsContext and process correlates accounted for 21% to 67% of the variance in the specific outcomes. Seven categories of research partnership practices were positively associated with successful synergy, capacity, and health outcomes: power sharing, partnership capacity, bridging social capital, shared values, community involvement in research, mutuality, and ethical management.

conclusionsThrough empirical testing of an innovative, multidisciplinary CBPR model, key context and process practices were identified that confirm the positive impact of partnership evaluation and self-reflection on research outcomes. Further, these findings provide academic and other key stakeholders with real-world practical recommendations to engage agencies, groups, and individuals who suffer most from inequities and may have unrecognized or indigenous knowledge, experience, and leadership to contribute to health and social research and to the creation of paths to wellness.

Indexed as

Community-Based Participatory ResearchHealth EquityHumansUnited States

Identifiers

PMID31866589
PMCPMC10765098
OpenAlexW2996927966

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.