Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31866364›Full record

ArticleBrain research2020

Cortical processing of configurally perceived odor mixtures.

Donald A Wilson, Gloria Fleming, Samantha M Vervoordt, Gérard Coureaud

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Biological constraints on configural odour mixture perception.The Journal of experimental biology · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Cortical Hub for Flavor Sensation in Rodents.Frontiers in systems neuroscience · 2021
    Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Donald A WilsonEmotional Brain Institute, Nathan Kline Institute for Psychiatric Research, Orangeburg, NY, USA; Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, NYU School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA. Electronic address: Donald.wilson@nyumc.org.
Gloria FlemingEmotional Brain Institute, Nathan Kline Institute for Psychiatric Research, Orangeburg, NY, USA.
Samantha M VervoordtEmotional Brain Institute, Nathan Kline Institute for Psychiatric Research, Orangeburg, NY, USA.
Gérard CoureaudLyon Neuroscience Research Center, INSERM U1028/CNRS UMR 5292/Lyon 1 University, Bron, France. Electronic address: gerard.coureaud@cnrs.fr.
Nathan Kline Institute for Psychiatric Research · USCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FR

Funding

CORTICAL PROCESSING OF OLFACTORY STIMULIR01DC003906 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA NORMAN · PI WILSON, DONALD A · 1999 to 2017
$4.2M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC003906
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Most odors are not composed of a single volatile chemical species, but rather are mixtures of many different volatile molecules, the perception of which is dependent on the identity and relative concentrations of the components. Changing either the identity or ratio of components can lead to shifts between configural and elemental perception of the mixture. For example, a 30/70 ratio of ethyl isobutyrate (odorant A, a strawberry scent) and ethyl maltol (odorant B, a caramel scent) is perceived as pineapple by humans - a configural percept distinct from the components. In contrast, a 68/32 ratio of the same odorants is perceived elementally, and is identified as the component odors. Here, we examined single-unit responses in the anterior and posterior piriform cortex (aPCX and pPCX) of mice to these A and B mixtures. We first demonstrate that mouse behavior is consistent with a configural/elemental perceptual shift as concentration ratio varies. We then compared responses to the configural mixture to those evoked by the elemental mixture, as well as to the individual components. Hierarchical cluster analyses suggest that in the mouse aPCX, the configural mixture was coded as distinct from both components, while the elemental mixture was coded as similar to the components. In contrast, mixture perception did not predict pPCX ensemble coding. Similar electrophysiological results were also observed in rats. The results suggest similar perceptual characteristics of the AB mixture across species, and a division in the roles of aPCX and pPCX in the coding of configural and elemental odor mixtures.

Indexed as

OdorantsAnimalsFemaleMaleMiceOlfactory PerceptionPiriform CortexRatsRats, Long-EvansConfigural perceptionElemental perceptionOdor mixturesPiriform cortexSingle-unit recording

Identifiers

PMID31866364
PMCPMC6941848
OpenAlexW2995130128

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.