Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31865918›Full record

ReviewTheoretical biology & medical modelling2019

UGM: a more stable procedure for large-scale multiple testing problems, new solutions to identify oncogene.

Chengyou Liu, Leilei Zhou, Yuhe Wang, Shuchang Tian, Junlin Zhu, Hang Qin, Yong Ding, Hongbing Jiang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Theoretical biology & medical modelling, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Chengyou LiuDepartment of Medical Engineering, Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.ORCID 0000-0003-0163-5297
Leilei ZhouDepartment of Medical Engineering, Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Yuhe WangDepartment of Medical Engineering, Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Shuchang TianDepartment of Medical Engineering, Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Junlin ZhuDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, 210016, Jiangsu, China. zhujunlin_njfh@163.com.
Hang QinDepartment of Medical Engineering, Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Yong DingDepartment of Mathematics and Computer, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Hongbing JiangDepartment of Medical Engineering, Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China. njptc_mzz@163.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Variations of gene expression levels play an important role in tumors. There are numerous methods to identify differentially expressed genes in high-throughput sequencing. Several algorithms endeavor to identify distinctive genetic patterns susceptable to particular diseases. Although these processes have been proved successful, the probability that the number of non-differentially expressed genes measured by false discovery rate (FDR) has a large standard deviation, and the misidentification rate (type I error) grows rapidly when the number of genes to be detected become larger. In this study we developed a new method, Unit Gamma Measurement (UGM), accounting for multiple hypotheses test statistics distribution, which could reduce the dependency problem. Simulated expression profile data and breast cancer RNA-Seq data were utilized to testify the accuracy of UGM. The results show that the number of non-differentially expressed genes identified by the UGM is very close to the real-evidence data, and the UGM also has a smaller standard error, range, quartile range and RMS error. In addition, the UGM can be used to screen many breast cancer-associated genes, such as BRCA1, BRCA2, PTEN, BRIP1, etc., provides better accuracy, robustness and efficiency, the method of identification differentially expressed genes in high-throughput sequencing.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsModels, StatisticalOncogenesBreast NeoplasmsComputer SimulationDatabases, GeneticFemaleGene Expression ProfilingGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseHumansCancer-associated genesDifferentially expressed genesFalse discovery rateRNA-Seq dataRoot mean square errorStandard deviation

Identifiers

PMID31865918
PMCPMC6927121

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.