ArticleBMC bioinformatics2019
VIO: ontology classification and study of vaccine responses given various experimental and analytical conditions.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- COVID-19 Coronavirus Vaccine Design Using Reverse Vaccinology and Machine Learning.Frontiers in immunology · 2020Pooled it
- VO: The Vaccine Ontology.Scientific data · 2026Article
- SEA CDM: Study-Experiment-Assay Common Data Model and Databases for Cross-Domain Data Integration and Analysis.Scientific data · 2026Article
- VO: The Vaccine Ontology.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- A fourfold pathogen reference ontology suite.Journal of biomedical semantics · 2025Article
- A Fourfold Pathogen Reference Ontology Suite.ArXiv · 2025Article
- Enriching the FIDEO ontology with food-drug interactions from online knowledge sources.Journal of biomedical semantics · 2024Article
- COVID-19 vaccine design using reverse and structural vaccinology, ontology-based literature mining and machine learning.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2022Article
- A new framework for host-pathogen interaction research.Frontiers in immunology · 2022Article
- VaximmutorDB: A Web-Based Vaccine Immune Factor Database and Its Application for Understanding Vaccine-Induced Immune Mechanisms.Frontiers in immunology · 2021Article
- Ontology-based Precision Vaccinology for Deep Mechanism Understanding and Precision Vaccine Development.Current pharmaceutical design · 2021Review
- Artificial intelligence and the hunt for immunological disorders.Current opinion in allergy and clinical immunology · 2020Review
- COVID-19 coronavirus vaccine design using reverse vaccinology and machine learning.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2020Article
- Expansion of Single Cell Transcriptomics Data of SARS-CoV Infection in Human Bronchial Epithelial Cells to COVID-19.Biological procedures online · 2020Article
- A 2018 workshop: vaccine and drug ontology studies (VDOS 2018).BMC bioinformatics · 2019Article
- Ontology-based representation and analysis of conditional vaccine immune responses using Omics data.CEUR workshop proceedings.Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDifferent human responses to the same vaccine were frequently observed. For example, independent studies identified overlapping but different transcriptomic gene expression profiles in Yellow Fever vaccine 17D (YF-17D) immunized human subjects. Different experimental and analysis conditions were likely contributed to the observed differences. To investigate this issue, we developed a Vaccine Investigation Ontology (VIO), and applied VIO to classify the different variables and relations among these variables systematically. We then evaluated whether the ontological VIO modeling and VIO-based statistical analysis would contribute to the enhanced vaccine investigation studies and a better understanding of vaccine response mechanisms.
resultsOur VIO modeling identified many variables related to data processing and analysis such as normalization method, cut-off criteria, software settings including software version. The datasets from two previous studies on human responses to YF-17D vaccine, reported by Gaucher et al. (2008) and Querec et al. (2009), were re-analyzed. We first applied the same LIMMA statistical method to re-analyze the Gaucher data set and identified a big difference in terms of significantly differentiated gene lists compared to the original study. The different results were likely due to the LIMMA version and software package differences. Our second study re-analyzed both Gaucher and Querec data sets but with the same data processing and analysis pipeline. Significant differences in differential gene lists were also identified. In both studies, we found that Gene Ontology (GO) enrichment results had more overlapping than the gene lists and enriched pathway lists. The visualization of the identified GO hierarchical structures among the enriched GO terms and their associated ancestor terms using GOfox allowed us to find more associations among enriched but often different GO terms, demonstrating the usage of GO hierarchical relations enhance data analysis.
conclusionsThe ontology-based analysis framework supports standardized representation, integration, and analysis of heterogeneous data of host responses to vaccines. Our study also showed that differences in specific variables might explain different results drawn from similar studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.