ArticleBMC medical genomics2019
Interpretable deep neural network for cancer survival analysis by integrating genomic and clinical data.
Article in BMC medical genomics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
39 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Survival prediction of glioblastoma patients using machine learning and deep learning: a systematic review.BMC cancer · 2024Pooled it
- TF-GateNet: An Interpretable and Biologically Guided Framework for Primary-Metastatic State Prediction from Somatic Genomic Alterations.Biomolecules · 2026Article
- Discovering proteo-transcriptomic networks via biologically informed heterogeneous graph learning.Nucleic acids research · 2026Article
- Interpretable neural network for risk stratification and drug target discovery based on PBMC transcriptomes.iScience · 2026Article
- Deep learning predicts onset acceleration of 38 age-associated diseases from blood and body composition biomarkers in the UK Biobank.GeroScience · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) in ovarian cancer: transforming detection, treatment, and prevention.Journal of ovarian research · 2026Review
- scSurv: a deep generative model for single-cell survival analysis.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2026Article
- CoFormerSurv: Collaborative transformer for multi-omics survival analysis.PLoS computational biology · 2026Article
- SubNExT: Towards accurate, efficient and robust gene expression classification for breast cancer subtyping.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2026Article
- Using Biological Networks to Guide Biomedical Prediction.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2026Article
- Interpretable Machine Learning for Survival Analysis.Biometrical journal. Biometrische Zeitschrift · 2025Review
- Beyond the black box with biologically informed neural networks.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2025Article
- Pan-cancer predictive survival model development and evaluation using electronic health record and genetic data across 10 cancer types.Discover oncology · 2025Article
- Machine learning-based survival models for predicting rehospitalization of older hip fracture patients: a retrospective cohort study.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2025Article
- Strategies to include prior knowledge in omics analysis with deep neural networks.Patterns (New York, N.Y.) · 2025Review
- APNet, an explainable sparse deep learning model to discover differentially active drivers of severe COVID-19.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2025Article
- Federated transfer learning with differential privacy for multi-omics survival analysis.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2025Article
- A comprehensive review of cancer survival prediction using multi-omics integration and clinical variables.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2025Review
- Identification of Gene Regulatory Networks Associated with Breast Cancer Patient Survival Using an Interpretable Deep Neural Network Model.Expert systems with applications · 2025Article
- Pathway-guided architectures for interpretable AI in biological research.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundUnderstanding the complex biological mechanisms of cancer patient survival using genomic and clinical data is vital, not only to develop new treatments for patients, but also to improve survival prediction. However, highly nonlinear and high-dimension, low-sample size (HDLSS) data cause computational challenges to applying conventional survival analysis.
resultsWe propose a novel biologically interpretable pathway-based sparse deep neural network, named Cox-PASNet, which integrates high-dimensional gene expression data and clinical data on a simple neural network architecture for survival analysis. Cox-PASNet is biologically interpretable where nodes in the neural network correspond to biological genes and pathways, while capturing the nonlinear and hierarchical effects of biological pathways associated with cancer patient survival. We also propose a heuristic optimization solution to train Cox-PASNet with HDLSS data. Cox-PASNet was intensively evaluated by comparing the predictive performance of current state-of-the-art methods on glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) and ovarian serous cystadenocarcinoma (OV) cancer. In the experiments, Cox-PASNet showed out-performance, compared to the benchmarking methods. Moreover, the neural network architecture of Cox-PASNet was biologically interpreted, and several significant prognostic factors of genes and biological pathways were identified.
conclusionsCox-PASNet models biological mechanisms in the neural network by incorporating biological pathway databases and sparse coding. The neural network of Cox-PASNet can identify nonlinear and hierarchical associations of genomic and clinical data to cancer patient survival. The open-source code of Cox-PASNet in PyTorch implemented for training, evaluation, and model interpretation is available at: https://github.com/DataX-JieHao/Cox-PASNet.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.