Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31865899›Full record

ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2019

Using an artificial neural network to map cancer common data elements to the biomedical research integrated domain group model in a semi-automated manner.

Robinette Renner, Shengyu Li, Yulong Huang, Ada Chaeli van der Zijp-Tan, Shaobo Tan, Dongqi Li, Mohan Vamsi Kasukurthi, Ryan Benton, Glen M Borchert, Jingshan Huang and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 46% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Challenges in Using a Graph Database to Represent and Analyze Mappings of Cancer Study Data Standards.AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Robinette RennerUniversity of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, 55455, USA.
Shengyu LiSchool of Computing, University of South Alabama, Mobile, AL, 36688, USA.
Yulong HuangCollege of Allied Health Professions, University of South Alabama, Mobile, AL, 36608, USA.
Ada Chaeli van der Zijp-TanCollege of Allied Health Professions, University of South Alabama, Mobile, AL, 36608, USA.
Shaobo TanSchool of Computing, University of South Alabama, Mobile, AL, 36688, USA.
Dongqi LiSchool of Computing, University of South Alabama, Mobile, AL, 36688, USA.
Mohan Vamsi KasukurthiSchool of Computing, University of South Alabama, Mobile, AL, 36688, USA.
Ryan BentonSchool of Computing, University of South Alabama, Mobile, AL, 36688, USA.
Glen M BorchertCollege of Medicine, University of South Alabama, Mobile, AL, 36688, USA.
Jingshan HuangSchool of Computing, University of South Alabama, Mobile, AL, 36688, USA. huang@southalabama.edu.
Guoqian JiangMayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA. jiang.guoqian@mayo.edu.
University of South Alabama · USMayo Clinic in Arizona · USQilu University of Technology · CNUniversity of Minnesota · US

Funding

caCDE-QA: A Quality Assurance Platform for Cancer Study Common Data ElementsU01CA180940 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI JIANG, GUOQIAN · 2014 to 2016
$1.1M
OmniSearch: A semantic search tool for discovering microRNAs' critical roles in hU01CA180982 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH ALABAMA · PI HUANG, JINGSHAN · 2014 to 2016
$913k
NCI NIH HHS U01 CA180940NCI NIH HHS U01 CA180982
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe medical community uses a variety of data standards for both clinical and research reporting needs. ISO 11179 Common Data Elements (CDEs) represent one such standard that provides robust data point definitions. Another standard is the Biomedical Research Integrated Domain Group (BRIDG) model, which is a domain analysis model that provides a contextual framework for biomedical and clinical research data. Mapping the CDEs to the BRIDG model is important; in particular, it can facilitate mapping the CDEs to other standards. Unfortunately, manual mapping, which is the current method for creating the CDE mappings, is error-prone and time-consuming; this creates a significant barrier for researchers who utilize CDEs.

methodsIn this work, we developed a semi-automated algorithm to map CDEs to likely BRIDG classes. First, we extended and improved our previously developed artificial neural network (ANN) alignment algorithm. We then used a collection of 1284 CDEs with robust mappings to BRIDG classes as the gold standard to train and obtain the appropriate weights of six attributes in CDEs. Afterward, we calculated the similarity between a CDE and each BRIDG class. Finally, the algorithm produces a list of candidate BRIDG classes to which the CDE of interest may belong.

resultsFor CDEs semantically similar to those used in training, a match rate of over 90% was achieved. For those partially similar, a match rate of 80% was obtained and for those with drastically different semantics, a match rate of up to 70% was achieved. DISCUSSION: Our semi-automated mapping process reduces the burden of domain experts. The weights are all significant in six attributes. Experimental results indicate that the availability of training data is more important than the semantic similarity of the testing data to the training data. We address the overfitting problem by selecting CDEs randomly and adjusting the ratio of training and verification samples.

conclusionsExperimental results on real-world use cases have proven the effectiveness and efficiency of our proposed methodology in mapping CDEs with BRIDG classes, both those CDEs seen before as well as new, unseen CDEs. In addition, it reduces the mapping burden and improves the mapping quality.

Indexed as

Biomedical ResearchCommon Data ElementsNeoplasmsNeural Networks, ComputerAlgorithmsHumansResearch DesignSemanticsArtificial neural networkBiomedical research integrated domain group (BRIDG) modelCommon data elementSchema mapping

Identifiers

PMID31865899
PMCPMC6927104
OpenAlexW2996571299

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.