Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31865554›Full record

ReviewAMB Express2019

Microbial inoculants: reviewing the past, discussing the present and previewing an outstanding future for the use of beneficial bacteria in agriculture.

Mariana Sanches Santos, Marco Antonio Nogueira, Mariangela Hungria

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in AMB Express, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 129 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
129citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

129 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Use of beneficial microorganisms in bean cultivation: strategies employed to increase productivity.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2026
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Genetic Diversity and Nodulation Potential ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

69 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Mariana Sanches SantosEmbrapa Soja, Cx. Postal 231, Londrina, Paraná, 86001-970, Brazil.
Marco Antonio NogueiraEmbrapa Soja, Cx. Postal 231, Londrina, Paraná, 86001-970, Brazil.
Mariangela HungriaEmbrapa Soja, Cx. Postal 231, Londrina, Paraná, 86001-970, Brazil. mariangela.hungria@embrapa.br.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5132-8685

Funding

Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico 400468/2016-6INCT-Plant-Growth Promoting Microorganisms for Agricultural Sustainability and Environmental Responsibility CAPESINCT-Plant-Growth Promoting Microorganisms for Agricultural Sustainability and Environmental Responsibility CNPq 465133/2014-2INCT-Plant-Growth Promoting Microorganisms for Agricultural Sustainability and Environmental Responsibility Fundação Araucária-STI
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

More than one hundred years have passed since the development of the first microbial inoculant for plants. Nowadays, the use of microbial inoculants in agriculture is spread worldwide for different crops and carrying different microorganisms. In the last decades, impressive progress has been achieved in the production, commercialization and use of inoculants. Nowadays, farmers are more receptive to the use of inoculants mainly because high-quality products and multi-purpose elite strains are available at the market, improving yields at low cost in comparison to chemical fertilizers. In the context of a more sustainable agriculture, microbial inoculants also help to mitigate environmental impacts caused by agrochemicals. Challenges rely on the production of microbial inoculants for a broader range of crops, and the expansion of the inoculated area worldwide, in addition to the search for innovative microbial solutions in areas subjected to increasing episodes of environmental stresses. In this review, we explore the world market for inoculants, showing which bacteria are prominent as inoculants in different countries, and we discuss the main research strategies that might contribute to improve the use of microbial inoculants in agriculture.

Indexed as

AzospirillumBiological nitrogen fixationChemical fertilizersInoculationPGPBPGPRPlant-growth-promoting bacteriaRhizobia

Identifiers

PMID31865554
PMCPMC6925611

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.