Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31865178›Full record

ArticleTranslational oncology2020

PIK3CA and KRAS Amplification in Esophageal Adenocarcinoma and their Impact on the Inflammatory Tumor Microenvironment and Prognosis.

Ahlem Essakly, Heike Loeser, Max Kraemer, Hakan Alakus, Seung-Hun Chon, Thomas Zander, Reinhard Buettner, Axel M Hillmer, Christiane J Bruns, Wolfgang Schroeder and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. The combination of gene hyperamplification and PD-L1 expression as a biomarker for the clinical benefit of tislelizumab in gastric/gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma.Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association · 2022
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ahlem EssaklyInstitute of Pathology, University Hospital Cologne, Germany.
Heike LoeserInstitute of Pathology, University Hospital Cologne, Germany. Electronic address: heike.loeser@uk-koeln.de.
Max KraemerInstitute of Pathology, University Hospital Cologne, Germany.
Hakan AlakusDepartment of General, Visceral and Cancer Surgery, University Hospital Cologne, Germany.
Seung-Hun ChonDepartment of General, Visceral and Cancer Surgery, University Hospital Cologne, Germany.
Thomas ZanderDepartment of Internal Medicine I, University Hospital Cologne, Germany.
Reinhard BuettnerInstitute of Pathology, University Hospital Cologne, Germany.
Axel M HillmerInstitute of Pathology, University Hospital Cologne, Germany.
Christiane J BrunsDepartment of General, Visceral and Cancer Surgery, University Hospital Cologne, Germany.
Wolfgang SchroederDepartment of General, Visceral and Cancer Surgery, University Hospital Cologne, Germany.
Florian GebauerDepartment of General, Visceral and Cancer Surgery, University Hospital Cologne, Germany.
Alexander QuaasInstitute of Pathology, University Hospital Cologne, Germany.
University Hospital Cologne · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gene amplifications of PIK3CA or KRAS induce a downstream activation of the AKT-mTOR or RAF-ERK-pathways. Interactions of the active AKT pathway have been implicated in the inflammatory tumor microenvironment. Nothing is known about these interactions or prognostic power in esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC). We retrospectively analyzed a large cohort of 685 EAC considering KRAS and PIK3CA gene amplification using fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and immunohistochemistry. These results were correlated with clinical and molecular data as well as the inflammatory tumor microenvironment. Amplifications of KRAS were seen in 94 patients (17.1%), PIK3CA amplifications in 23 patients (5.0%). KRAS amplifications significantly correlated with nodal positive patients and poorer overall survival (OS) in the subgroup without neoadjuvant treatment (p = 0.004), coamplifications of Her2 (p = 0.027), and TP53 mutations (p = 0.016). PIK3CA amplifications significantly correlated with a high amount of tumor infiltrating T cells (p = 0.003) and showed a tendency to better OS (p = 0.068). A correlation with checkpoint makers (PD-L1, LAG3, VISTA, TIM3, IDO) could not be revealed. Our findings are the first to link the KRAS amplified genotype with lymphonodal positivity and poor prognosis and the PIK3CA-amplified genotype with a T cell-rich microenvironment in EAC. Future studies must show whether these two genotype subgroups can be therapeutically influenced. A dual inhibition of MEK and SHP2T could be effective in the subgroup of KRAS amplified EACs and an immune checkpoint blockade may prove to be particularly promising in the subgroup of PIK3CA-amplified EACs.

Identifiers

PMID31865178
PMCPMC6931191
OpenAlexW2995728887

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.