Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31865171›Full record

ArticleCognition2020

Differential effects of knowledge and aging on the encoding and retrieval of everyday activities.

Maverick E Smith, Kimberly M Newberry, Heather R Bailey

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cognition, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. The Role of Event Number and Duration in Time-Compressed Memory Replay.Open mind : discoveries in cognitive science · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Knowledge guides attention to goal-relevant information in older adults.Cognitive research: principles and implications · 2021
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Maverick E SmithKansas State University, USA. Electronic address: ms1434@ksu.edu.
Kimberly M NewberryKansas State University, USA. Electronic address: kmanewberry@ksu.edu.
Heather R BaileyKansas State University, USA. Electronic address: hbailey@ksu.edu.
Kansas State University · US

Funding

University of Kansas Alzheimer's Disease Research Center (KU ADRC)P30AG072973 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS MEDICAL CENTER · PI JEFFREY Murray BURNS, RUSSELL H. SWERDLOW · 2021 to 2026
$25.3M
The role of prestimulus oscillatory brain dynamics in auditory memoryP20GM113109 · NIGMS · KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY · PI Heather Bailey · 2017 to 2026
$24.1M
University of Kansas Alzheimer's Disease Core CentersP30AG035982 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS MEDICAL CENTER · PI SWERDLOW, RUSSELL H. · 2011 to 2020
$16.6M
NIA NIH HHS P30 AG035982NIA NIH HHS P30 AG072973NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM113109
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We deconstruct continuous streams of action into smaller, meaningful events. Research has shown that the ability to segment continuous activity into such events and remember their contents declines with age; however, knowledge improves with age. We investigated how young and older adults use knowledge to more efficiently encode and later remember information from everyday events by having participants view a series of self-paced slideshows depicting everyday activities. For some activities, older adults produce more normative scripts than do young adults (older adult activities) and for other activities, young adults produce more normative scripts than do older adults (young adult activities). Overall, participants viewed event boundaries longer than within events (i.e., the event boundary advantage) replicating prior research (e.g., Hard, Recchia, & Tversky, 2011). Importantly, older adults demonstrated the boundary advantage for the older adult activities but not the young adult activities, and they also had better recognition memory for the older adult activities than the young adult activities. We also found that the magnitude of a participant's boundary advantage was associated with better memory, but only for the less knowledgeable activities. Results indicate that older adults use their intact knowledge to better encode and remember everyday activities, but that knowledge and event segmentation may have independent influences on event memory.

Indexed as

AgingMental RecallAgedHumansMemoryRecognition, PsychologyYoung AdultAgingEvent perceptionKnowledgeTop-down effects on event cognitionViewing time

Identifiers

PMID31865171
PMCPMC7028520
OpenAlexW2995792178

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.