ArticleMolecular therapy. Nucleic acids2020
Is There Any Sequence Feature in the RNA Pseudouridine Modification Prediction Problem?
Article in Molecular therapy. Nucleic acids, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- The impact of psuedouridine modification on human tRNA.Biochemical Society transactions · 2026Review
- Biological Sequence Classification: A Review on Data and General Methods.Research (Washington, D.C.) · 2022Article
- HSM6AP: a high-precision predictor for the HomoRNA biology · 2021Article
- RMDisease: a database of genetic variants that affect RNA modifications, with implications for epitranscriptome pathogenesis.Nucleic acids research · 2021Article
- Article
- iDNA-MT: Identification DNA Modification Sites in Multiple Species by Using Multi-Task Learning Based a Neural Network Tool.Frontiers in genetics · 2021Article
- NonClasGP-Pred: robust and efficient prediction of non-classically secreted proteins by integrating subset-specific optimal models of imbalanced data.Microbial genomics · 2020Article
- PSBP-SVM: A Machine Learning-Based Computational Identifier for Predicting Polystyrene Binding Peptides.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2020Article
- A Method for Identifying Vesicle Transport Proteins Based on LibSVM and MRMD.Computational and mathematical methods in medicine · 2020Article
- PSI-MOUSE: Predicting Mouse Pseudouridine Sites From Sequence and Genome-Derived Features.Evolutionary bioinformatics online · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pseudouridine (Ψ) is the most abundant RNA modification and has been found in many kinds of RNAs, including snRNA, rRNA, tRNA, mRNA, and snoRNA. Thus, Ψ sites play a significant role in basic research and drug development. Although some experimental techniques have been developed to identify Ψ sites, they are expensive and time consuming, especially in the post-genomic era with the explosive growth of known RNA sequences. Thus, highly accurate computational methods are urgently required to quickly detect the Ψ sites on uncharacterized RNA sequences. Several predictors have been proposed using multifarious features, but their evaluated performances are still unsatisfactory. In this study, we first identified Ψ sites for H. sapiens, S. cerevisiae, and M. musculus using the sequence features from the bi-profile Bayes (BPB) method based on the random forest (RF) and support vector machine (SVM) algorithms, where the performances were evaluated using 5-fold cross-validation and independent tests. It was found that the SVM-based accuracies were 3.55% and 5.09% lower than the iPseU-CUU predictor for the H_990 and S_628 datasets, respectively. Almost the same-level results were obtained for M_994 and an independent H_200 dataset, even showing a 5.0% improvement for S_200. Then, three different kinds of features, including basic Kmer, general parallel correlation pseudo-dinucleotide composition (PC-PseDNC-General), and nucleotide chemical property (NCP) and nucleotide density (ND) from the iRNA-PseU method, were combined with BPB to show their comprehensive performances, where the effective features are selected by the max-relevance-max-distance (MRMD) method. The best evaluated accuracies of the combined features for the S_628 and M_994 datasets were achieved at 70.54% and 72.45%, which were 2.39% and 0.65% higher than iPseU-CUU. For the S_200 dataset, it was also improved 8% from 69% to 77%. However, there was no obvious improvement for H. sapiens, which was evaluated as approximately 63.23% and 72.0% for the H_990 and H_200 datasets, respectively. The overall performances for Ψ identification using BPB features as well as the combined features were not obviously improved. Although some kinds of feature extraction methods based on the RNA sequence information have been applied to construct the predictors in previous studies, the corresponding accuracies are generally in the range of 60%-70%. Thus, researchers need to reconsider whether there is any sequence feature in the RNA Ψ modification prediction problem.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.