Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31864769›Full record

ArticleJournal of manipulative and physiological therapeutics2019

Development of a Clinical Decision Aid for Chiropractic Management of Common Conditions Causing Low Back Pain in Veterans: Results of a Consensus Process.

Robert D Vining, Zacariah K Shannon, Stacie A Salsbury, Lance Corber, Amy L Minkalis, Christine M Goertz

Open access · greenAbstract readConsensus Statement
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of manipulative and physiological therapeutics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Multimodal chiropractic care for migraine: A pilot randomized controlled trial.Cephalalgia : an international journal of headache · 2021
    Trial
  9. Article
  10. When there is little or no research evidence: a clinical decision tool.The Journal of the Canadian Chiropractic Association · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Robert D ViningPalmer Center for Chiropractic Research, Davenport, Iowa. Electronic address: robert.vining@palmer.edu.
Zacariah K ShannonPalmer Center for Chiropractic Research, Davenport, Iowa.
Stacie A SalsburyPalmer Center for Chiropractic Research, Davenport, Iowa.
Lance CorberPalmer Center for Chiropractic Research, Davenport, Iowa.
Amy L MinkalisPalmer Center for Chiropractic Research, Davenport, Iowa.
Christine M GoertzSpine IQ, Oskaloosa, Iowa.
Palmer College of Chiropractic · US

Funding

Pain Management Collaboratory Coordinating Center (PMC3)U24AT009769 · NCCIH · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI WILLIAM C BECKER, Alicia Heapy · 2017 to 2026
$16.4M
Chiropractic Care for Veterans: A Pragmatic Randomized Trial Addressing Dose Effects for cLBPUH3AT009761 · NCCIH · PALMER COLLEGE OF CHIROPRACTIC · PI GOERTZ, CHRISTINE MARIE, LONG, CYNTHIA R · 2019 to 2024
$7.2M
Chiropractic Care for Veterans: A Pragmatic Randomized Trial Addressing Dose Effects for cLBPUG3AT009761 · NCCIH · PALMER COLLEGE OF CHIROPRACTIC · PI GOERTZ, CHRISTINE MARIE · 2017 to 2018
$1.7M
NCCIH NIH HHS U24 AT009769NCCIH NIH HHS UG3 AT009761NCCIH NIH HHS UH3 AT009761
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe purpose of this study was to develop a clinical decision aid for chiropractic management of common conditions causing low back pain (LBP) in veterans receiving treatment in US Veterans Affairs (VA) health care facilities.

methodsA consensus study using an online, modified Delphi technique and Research Electronic Data Capture web application was conducted among VA doctors of chiropractic. Investigators reviewed the scientific literature pertaining to diagnosis and treatment of nonsurgical, neuromusculoskeletal LBP. Thirty seed statements summarizing evidence for chiropractic management, a graphical stepped management tool outlining diagnosis-informed treatment approaches, and support materials were then reviewed by an expert advisory committee. Email notifications invited 113 VA chiropractic clinicians to participate as Delphi panelists. Panelists rated the appropriateness of the seed statements and the stepped process on a 1-to-9 scale using the RAND/University of California, Los Angeles methodology. Statements were accepted when both the median rating and 80% of all ratings occurred within the highly appropriate range.

resultsThirty-nine panelists (74% male) with a mean (standard deviation) age of 46 (11) years and clinical experience of 17 (11) years participated in the study. Accepted statements addressed included (1) essential components of chiropractic care, (2) treatments for conditions causing or contributing to LBP, (3) spinal manipulation mechanisms, (4) descriptions and mechanisms of commonly used chiropractic interventions, and (5) a graphical stepped clinical management tool.

conclusionThis study group produced a chiropractic clinical decision aid for LBP management, which can be used to support evidence-based care decisions for veterans with LBP.

Indexed as

Clinical Decision-MakingLow Back PainManipulation, ChiropracticVeteransAdultChiropracticClinical ProtocolsDelphi TechniqueFemaleHumansMaleManipulation, SpinalMiddle AgedChiropracticComplementary TherapiesConsensusDecision Support TechniquesLow Back PainUnited StatesVeterans

Identifiers

PMID31864769
PMCPMC7183425
OpenAlexW2995358607

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.