Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31864398›Full record

SynthesisJournal of orthopaedic surgery and research2019

Minimally invasive percutaneous plate osteosynthesis versus intramedullary nail fixation for distal tibial fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Bo Wang, Yang Zhao, Qian Wang, Bin Hu, Liang Sun, Cheng Ren, Zhong Li, Kun Zhang, Dingjun Hao, Teng Ma and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative StudyMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 64 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Efficacy and safety of MIPO versus ORIF in distal tibial fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of orthopaedics and traumatology : official journal of the Italian Society of Orthopaedics and Traumatology · 2026
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Suprapatellar vs infrapatellar approaches for intramedullary nailing of distal tibial fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of orthopaedics and traumatology : official journal of the Italian Society of Orthopaedics and Traumatology · 2023
    Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. The semi-extended infrapatellar intramedullary nailing of distal tibia fractures: a randomized clinical trial.Journal of orthopaedics and traumatology : official journal of the Italian Society of Orthopaedics and Traumatology · 2022
    Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Plate-Assisted Intramedullary Nailing of Distal Tibia Fractures.Sultan Qaboos University medical journal · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Does the distal nail position impact the rates of misalignment and bone union in distal tibial fractures?European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2023
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Bo WangDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, HongHui Hospital, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, Shaan'xi Province, China.
Yang ZhaoDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, HongHui Hospital, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, Shaan'xi Province, China.
Qian WangDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, HongHui Hospital, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, Shaan'xi Province, China.
Bin HuDepartment of Hematology, Xi'an GaoXin Hospital, Xi'an, Shaan'xi Province, China.
Liang SunDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, HongHui Hospital, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, Shaan'xi Province, China.
Cheng RenDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, HongHui Hospital, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, Shaan'xi Province, China.
Zhong LiDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, HongHui Hospital, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, Shaan'xi Province, China.
Kun ZhangDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, HongHui Hospital, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, Shaan'xi Province, China.
Dingjun HaoDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, HongHui Hospital, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, Shaan'xi Province, China.
Teng MaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, HongHui Hospital, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, Shaan'xi Province, China. free40@126.com.
Yao LuDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, HongHui Hospital, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, Shaan'xi Province, China. drluyao@163.com.
Xi'an Honghui Hospital · CNXi'an Jiaotong University · CN

Funding

Project of Science and Technology Department of Shaanxi Province 2015SF116, 2016SF-340, 2019JQ-976
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe treatment for distal tibial fractures remains controversial to date. Minimally invasive percutaneous plate osteosynthesis (MIPPO) and intramedullary nailing (IMN) are well-accepted and effective methods for distal tibial fractures, but these methods were associated with complications. This study aimed to assess and compare the clinical and functional outcomes in patients with distal tibial fractures treated with MIPPO or IMN.

methodsWe systematically reviewed randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared MIPPO with IMN in patients with distal tibial fractures from inception till 15 August 2019. Also, quantitative summaries of time to reunion, rate of complications, and functional outcomes were evaluated.

resultsThe pooled results suggested that patients in the MIPPO group had a longer time to reunion with a mean difference of 1.21 weeks [P = 0.02; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.16-2.26)] than those in the IMN group. The overall union complications and deep infection between IMN and MIPPO were similar (P > 0.05). IMN had a significantly low risk of wound complications [risk ratio (RR) = 0.51, P = 0.00, 95% CI 0.34-0.77)]. The pooled functional outcomes of the two groups remained controversial by different evaluating scores.

conclusionsCompared to MIPPO, IMN had a significantly low risk of wound complications and associated with limited time for reunion. Although the pooled functional outcomes of the two groups were controversial due to different evaluating scores, IMN was the preferred surgical technique than MIPPO for treating distal tibial fractures.

Indexed as

Bone NailsBone PlatesFracture Fixation, InternalHumansMinimally Invasive Surgical ProceduresRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTibial FracturesDistal tibial fracturesIntramedullary nailMeta-analysisMinimally invasive percutaneous plate osteosynthesis

Identifiers

PMID31864398
PMCPMC6925456
OpenAlexW2996598389

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.