Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31864305›Full record

ArticleBMC emergency medicine2019

Stakeholder opinion on the proposal to introduce 'treat and referral' into the Irish emergency medical service.

Brian Power, Gerard Bury, John Ryan

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC emergency medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Barriers and opportunities of establishing an integrated prehospital emergency response system in North West Ethiopia: a qualitative study.Injury prevention : journal of the International Society for Child and Adolescent Injury Prevention · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Alternatives to direct emergency department conveyance of ambulance patients: a scoping review of the evidence.Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Brian PowerPre-Hospital Emergency Care Council, Beech House, Millennium Pk, Naas, Co., Kildare, W91 TK7N, Ireland. brianrpower@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0001-9729-1614
Gerard BuryCentre for Emergency Medical Science, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
John RyanEmergency Department, St Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Irish ambulance services have traditionally transported all patients following an emergency (112/999) call, regardless of acuity, to an emergency department (ED). A proposal to introduce Treat and Referral, an established care pathway in some jurisdictions, is under active consideration in Ireland. This will present a significant change. Stakeholder engagement is recognised as an essential component of management of such change. This study has conducted a multicentre, cross-sectional survey exploring opinions on the introduction of Treat and Referral among key Irish stakeholders; consultants in emergency medicine, paramedics and advanced paramedics.

methodsPublic-sector consultants in emergency medicine (EM), registered paramedics and advanced paramedics, in Ireland at the time of the study, were invited to complete an on-line survey.

resultsA significant finding was that 90% of both cohorts (EM consultants and registered paramedic practitioners) support written after-care instructions being given to referred patients, that > 83% agree that Treat and Referral will reduce unnecessary ambulance journeys and that 70% are in favour of their own family member being offered Treat and Referral. Consensus was reached between respondents that Treat and Referral would improve care and increase clinical judgement of practitioners. Differences were identified in relation to the increased availability of ambulances locally, that only adults should be included, and that research was required to extend Treat and Referral beyond the index conditions. There was no consensus on whether general practitioners (GPs) should be directly informed.

conclusionsThis study identified that the Irish healthcare practitioners surveyed are supportive of the introduction of Treat and Referral into Ireland. It also affords healthcare policymakers the opportunity to address the concerns raised, in particular the clinical level which will be targeted for inclusion in this extended scope of practice.

Indexed as

AmbulancesCross-Sectional StudiesEmergency Medical ServicesHumansIrelandReferral and ConsultationTriageAdmission avoidanceConsultant in emergency medicineEmergency departmentsParamedicPrehospital careTreat and referralTreat and release

Identifiers

PMID31864305
PMCPMC6925841

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.