Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31864158›Full record

ArticleJournal of psychiatric research2020

Developing algorithms to predict adult onset internalizing disorders: An ensemble learning approach.

Anthony J Rosellini, Siyu Liu, Grace N Anderson, Sophia Sbi, Esther S Tung, Evdokia Knyazhanskaya

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of psychiatric research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Anthony J RoselliniCenter for Anxiety and Related Disorders, Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA. Electronic address: ajrosell@bu.edu.
Siyu LiuCenter for Anxiety and Related Disorders, Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA.
Grace N AndersonCenter for Anxiety and Related Disorders, Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA.
Sophia SbiCenter for Anxiety and Related Disorders, Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA.
Esther S TungCenter for Anxiety and Related Disorders, Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA.
Evdokia KnyazhanskayaCenter for Anxiety and Related Disorders, Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA.

Funding

Developing Risk Algorithms of Internalizing Disorder Etiology and CourseK01MH106710 · NIMH · HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL · PI ROSELLINI, ANTHONY JOSEPH · 2015 to 2018
$665k
NIMH NIH HHS K01 MH106710
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A growing literature is utilizing machine learning methods to develop psychopathology risk algorithms that can be used to inform preventive intervention. However, efforts to develop algorithms for internalizing disorder onset have been limited. The goal of this study was to utilize prospective survey data and ensemble machine learning to develop algorithms predicting adult onset internalizing disorders. The data were from Waves 1-2 of the National Epidemiological Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions (n = 34,653). Outcomes were incident occurrence of DSM-IV generalized anxiety, panic, social phobia, depression, and mania between Waves 1-2. In total, 213 risk factors (features) were operationalized based on their presence/occurrence at the time of or before Wave 1. For each of the five internalizing disorder outcomes, super learning was used to generate a composite algorithm from several linear and non-linear classifiers (e.g., random forests, k-nearest neighbors). AUCs achieved by the cross-validated super learner ensembles were in the range of 0.76 (depression) to 0.83 (mania), and were higher than AUCs achieved by the individual algorithms. Individuals in the top 10% of super learner predicted risk accounted for 37.97% (depression) to 53.39% (social anxiety) of all incident cases. Thus, the algorithms achieved acceptable-to-excellent prediction accuracy with a high concentration of incident cases observed among individuals predicted to be highest risk. In parallel with the development of effective preventive interventions, further validation, expansion, and dissemination of algorithms predicting internalizing disorder onset/trajectory could be of great value.

Indexed as

Machine LearningRisk AssessmentAdultAnxiety DisordersBipolar DisorderDepressive DisorderHealth SurveysHumansLongitudinal StudiesPanic DisorderPhobia, SocialAlgorithmAnxietyIncidenceMachine learningMoodRisk score

Identifiers

PMID31864158
PMCPMC7027595

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.