ArticleMedical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research2019
C-Reactive Protein and All-Cause Mortality in Patients with Stable Coronary Artery Disease: A Secondary Analysis Based on a Retrospective Cohort Study.
Article in Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Predictive value of baseline C-reactive protein level in patients with stable coronary artery disease: A meta-analysis.Medicine · 2022Pooled it
- The combined effect of CRP and blood pressure on the risk of mortality in patients with type 2 diabetes.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Impact of the De Ritis Ratio on the Prognosis of Patients with Stable Coronary Artery Disease Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2022Article
- Triglyceride-glucose index predicts outcome in patients with chronic coronary syndrome independently of other risk factors and myocardial ischaemia.European heart journal open · 2021Article
- C-Reactive Protein Level Predicts Cardiovascular Risk in Chinese Young Female Population.Oxidative medicine and cellular longevity · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND The association between C-reactive protein (CRP) and all-cause mortality (ACM) in patients with stable coronary artery disease (CAD) is unclear. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to explore the correlation between CRP and ACM in stable CAD patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS This study was a secondary analysis. Between October 2014 and October 2017, 196 patients aged 43 to 98 years who had a first diagnosis of stable CAD were recruited into this study. We divided the patients into 4 groups (Quartile 1: 0.01-0.03 mg/dL; Quartile 2: 0.04-0.11 mg/dL; Quartile 3: 0.12-0.33 mg/dL; and Quartile 4: 0.34-9.20 mg/dL) according to the concentration of CRP. The indicator surveyed in this research was ACM. RESULTS During a median follow-up of 783 days, ACM occurred in 18 patients, with a mortality rate of 9.18% (18/196). Univariate analysis showed that elevated CRP was closely related to ACM in stable CAD patients (P<0.005). After controlling for potential confounding factors by multivariate logistic regression analysis, this relationship still existed. Pearson correlation analysis showed that elevated CRP log10 transform was associated with LVEF (r=-0.1936, P=0.0067). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis showed that the optimal concentration of CRP for the diagnosis of ACM was 0.345, and the area under the curve (AUC) was 0.735. CONCLUSIONS Elevated CRP is associated with ACM in stable CAD patients, and the best diagnostic threshold is 0.345.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.