Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31863549›Full record

ReviewIntegrated environmental assessment and management2020

A State-of-the-Art Review of Indigenous Peoples and Environmental Pollution.

Álvaro Fernández-Llamazares, María Garteizgogeascoa, Niladri Basu, Eduardo Sonnewend Brondizio, Mar Cabeza, Joan Martínez-Alier, Pamela McElwee, Victoria Reyes-García

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Integrated environmental assessment and management, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Indigenous peoples as trustees of forests: a bio-socio-cultural approach to international law.International environmental agreements : politics, law and economics · 2025
    Article
  10. The global relevance of locally grounded ethnobiology.Journal of ethnobiology and ethnomedicine · 2024
    Article
  11. Editorial: The outcomes of pollutants on glia.Frontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. CaCuNanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Mapping the Way to Good Health: The Interdisciplinary Challenges of Geographers in Medical Research.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Álvaro Fernández-LlamazaresHelsinki Institute of Sustainability Science, Faculty of Biological and Environmental Sciences, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7813-0222
María GarteizgogeascoaGlobal Change and Conservation, Organismal and Evolutionary Biology Research Programme, Faculty of Biological and Environmental Sciences, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Niladri BasuFaculty of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2695-1037
Eduardo Sonnewend BrondizioDepartment of Anthropology, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9376-8366
Mar CabezaHelsinki Institute of Sustainability Science, Faculty of Biological and Environmental Sciences, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7410-7631
Joan Martínez-AlierInstitut de Ciència i Tecnologia Ambientals, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Bellatera, Barcelona, Spain.
Pamela McElweeDepartment of Human Ecology, School of Environmental and Biological Sciences, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3525-9285
Victoria Reyes-GarcíaInstitut de Ciència i Tecnologia Ambientals, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Bellatera, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2914-8055

Funding

Academy of Finland 311176Fundación BBVA 2017 Leonardo Grant for ResearchersKoneen Säätiö
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Indigenous peoples (IPs) worldwide are confronted by the increasing threat of pollution. Based on a comprehensive review of the literature (n = 686 studies), we present the current state of knowledge on: 1) the exposure and vulnerability of IPs to pollution; 2) the environmental, health, and cultural impacts of pollution upon IPs; and 3) IPs' contributions to prevent, control, limit, and abate pollution from local to global scales. Indigenous peoples experience large burdens of environmental pollution linked to the expansion of commodity frontiers and industrial development, including agricultural, mining, and extractive industries, as well as urban growth, waste dumping, and infrastructure and energy development. Nevertheless, IPs are contributing to limit pollution in different ways, including through environmental monitoring and global policy advocacy, as well as through local resistance toward polluting activities. This work adds to growing evidence of the breadth and depth of environmental injustices faced by IPs worldwide, and we conclude by highlighting the need to increase IPs' engagement in environmental decision-making regarding pollution control. Integr Environ Assess Manag 2020;16:324-341. © 2019 The Authors. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of Society of Environmental Toxicology & Chemistry (SETAC).

Indexed as

Environmental PollutionIndigenous PeoplesEcotoxicologyEnvironmental MonitoringHumansRisk AssessmentEnvironmental justiceHealth burdensIndigenous knowledgeNative AmericansPollution

Identifiers

PMID31863549
PMCPMC7187223

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.