ArticleUpdates in surgery2020
Do microsatellite instability (MSI) and deficient mismatch repair (dMMR) affect the pathologic complete response (pCR) in patients with rectal cancer who received neoadjuvant treatment?
Article in Updates in surgery, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Microsatellite instability in rectal cancer: what does it mean? A study of two randomized trials and a systematic review of the literature.Histopathology · 2022Pooled it
- Genomic, transcriptomic, and molecular predictors of response to neoadjuvant therapy in locally advanced rectal cancer: a narrative review.Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England) · 2026Review
- A comparison by mismatch repair status of real-world characteristics and outcomes in patients with stage II/III rectal cancer in the Netherlands.International journal of cancer · 2026Article
- Microsatellite instability and immunotherapy: redefining the role of surgery in colorectal cancer.Updates in surgery · 2026Article
- Overcoming the Challenge: A Comprehensive Review of Neoadjuvant Treatment Resistance in Rectal Cancer.Journal of gastrointestinal cancer · 2025Review
- Prognosis and influencing factors of patients with different lymph node statuses after pathological complete response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in rectal cancer.Oncology letters · 2025Article
- The Crying Need for a Better Response Assessment in Rectal Cancer.Current treatment options in oncology · 2023Review
- Pathological Complete Response Following Neoadjuvant Tislelizumab Monotherapy in Treatment-Naive Locally Advanced, MMR-Deficient/MSI-High Ascending Colon Cancer: A Case Report.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Article
- A Predictive Model to Evaluate Pathologic Complete Response in Rectal Adenocarcinoma.Technology in cancer research & treatmentArticle
- Microsatellite Instability Correlated Inflammatory Markers and their Prognostic Value in the Rectal Cancer Following Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy: A Hypothesis-generating Study.In vivo (Athens, Greece)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Recently, individualized approaches for the treatment of locally advanced rectal cancers (RC) have been introduced to determine the most beneficial one for boosting the tumor response and assessing the response more accurately. However, despite each patient and tumor have different molecular features, the studies at the molecular level are very limited. In this study, examining the clinical factors which are predictive of pathologic complete response (pCR), helping to determine a treatment program for the management of patients with locally advanced RC, and evaluating the relation between regression grade and MMR-MSI were aimed. 341 RC cases who had undergone surgery were included and divided into three groups according to their response to neoadjuvant treatment. The following parameters were analyzed for all patients: age at diagnosis, sex, tumor location, tumor differentiation, TNM stage, histological subtype, CEA (mean: < 5 ng/ml) level, lymphovascular-neural invasion, presence of mucinous subtype, grade, MMR, and MSI statuses. 147 patients (43.2%) had no response (group 1), 141 patients (41.3%) had an intermediate response (group 2), and 53 patients (15.5%) had a complete response (group 3). Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy was used in all of the patients with the same protocol. Multivariate analysis revealed that clinical T stage (p: 0.099) and MMR (p: 0.048) were the parameters which were significantly associated with pCR. Since MMR and MSI statuses were found to affect pCR, more careful patient selection for "watch and wait" protocol and further studies on molecular structures of the tumors for individualized therapies are required.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.