Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31863279›Full record

ArticleUpdates in surgery2020

Do microsatellite instability (MSI) and deficient mismatch repair (dMMR) affect the pathologic complete response (pCR) in patients with rectal cancer who received neoadjuvant treatment?

Turan Acar, Nihan Acar, Erdinç Kamer, Mustafa Agah Tekindal, Fevzi Cengiz, Haldun Kar, Kemal Atahan, Mehmet Haciyanli

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Updates in surgery, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. The Crying Need for a Better Response Assessment in Rectal Cancer.Current treatment options in oncology · 2023
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Turan AcarDepartment of General Surgery, İzmir Katip Çelebi University, Basın Sitesi, Izmir, Turkey. drturanacar1982@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4261-2673
Nihan AcarDepartment of General Surgery, İzmir Atatürk Training and Research Hospital, Izmir, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0720-3794
Erdinç KamerDepartment of General Surgery, İzmir Atatürk Training and Research Hospital, Izmir, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5084-5867
Mustafa Agah TekindalDepartment of Biostatistics, Selçuk University, Konya, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4060-7048
Fevzi CengizDepartment of General Surgery, İzmir Atatürk Training and Research Hospital, Izmir, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1614-5568
Haldun KarDepartment of General Surgery, İzmir Atatürk Training and Research Hospital, Izmir, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7710-0665
Kemal AtahanDepartment of General Surgery, İzmir Atatürk Training and Research Hospital, Izmir, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0096-8789
Mehmet HaciyanliDepartment of General Surgery, İzmir Katip Çelebi University, Basın Sitesi, Izmir, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0512-1405
Izmir Atatürk Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi · TRIzmir Kâtip Çelebi University · TRSelçuk University · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recently, individualized approaches for the treatment of locally advanced rectal cancers (RC) have been introduced to determine the most beneficial one for boosting the tumor response and assessing the response more accurately. However, despite each patient and tumor have different molecular features, the studies at the molecular level are very limited. In this study, examining the clinical factors which are predictive of pathologic complete response (pCR), helping to determine a treatment program for the management of patients with locally advanced RC, and evaluating the relation between regression grade and MMR-MSI were aimed. 341 RC cases who had undergone surgery were included and divided into three groups according to their response to neoadjuvant treatment. The following parameters were analyzed for all patients: age at diagnosis, sex, tumor location, tumor differentiation, TNM stage, histological subtype, CEA (mean: < 5 ng/ml) level, lymphovascular-neural invasion, presence of mucinous subtype, grade, MMR, and MSI statuses. 147 patients (43.2%) had no response (group 1), 141 patients (41.3%) had an intermediate response (group 2), and 53 patients (15.5%) had a complete response (group 3). Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy was used in all of the patients with the same protocol. Multivariate analysis revealed that clinical T stage (p: 0.099) and MMR (p: 0.048) were the parameters which were significantly associated with pCR. Since MMR and MSI statuses were found to affect pCR, more careful patient selection for "watch and wait" protocol and further studies on molecular structures of the tumors for individualized therapies are required.

Indexed as

Chemoradiotherapy, AdjuvantDNA Mismatch RepairMicrosatellite InstabilityNeoadjuvant TherapyHumansPatient SelectionRectal NeoplasmsComplete responseMicrosatellite instabilityMismatch repairRectal cancer

Identifiers

PMID31863279
OpenAlexW2996300427

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.