Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31863199›Full record

ArticleEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2020

A new adhesive bone conduction hearing system as a treatment option for transient hearing loss after middle ear surgery.

Roxanne Weiss, Andreas Loth, Martin Leinung, Sven Balster, Daniel Hirth, Timo Stöver, Silke Helbig, Sabine Kramer

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Audiological benefit and subjective satisfaction with the ADHEAR hearing system in children with unilateral conductive hearing loss.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2021
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Who are good adult candidates for cartilage conduction hearing aids?European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Roxanne WeissDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Universitätsklinikum Frankfurt (UKF), J.W. Goethe-Universität Frankfurt Am Main, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590, Frankfurt, Germany. Roxanne.weiss@kgu.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3394-0608
Andreas LothDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Universitätsklinikum Frankfurt (UKF), J.W. Goethe-Universität Frankfurt Am Main, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590, Frankfurt, Germany.
Martin LeinungDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Universitätsklinikum Frankfurt (UKF), J.W. Goethe-Universität Frankfurt Am Main, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590, Frankfurt, Germany.
Sven BalsterDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Universitätsklinikum Frankfurt (UKF), J.W. Goethe-Universität Frankfurt Am Main, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590, Frankfurt, Germany.
Daniel HirthDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Universitätsklinikum Frankfurt (UKF), J.W. Goethe-Universität Frankfurt Am Main, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590, Frankfurt, Germany.
Timo StöverDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Universitätsklinikum Frankfurt (UKF), J.W. Goethe-Universität Frankfurt Am Main, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590, Frankfurt, Germany.
Silke HelbigDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Universitätsklinikum Frankfurt (UKF), J.W. Goethe-Universität Frankfurt Am Main, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590, Frankfurt, Germany.
Sabine KramerDepartment of Phoniatrics and Pediatric Audiology, Universitätsklinikum Frankfurt (UKF), J.W. Goethe-Universität Frankfurt Am Main, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590, Frankfurt, Germany.
Goethe University Frankfurt · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe objective of this prospective, single-subject, repeated measures study was to evaluate the audiological benefit and patient satisfaction with an adhesive, pressure-free bone conduction hearing system (ADHEAR; MED-EL, Innsbruck, Austria) in patients who underwent middle ear surgery with transient hearing loss due to auditory canal tamponade.

methodsEleven adult subjects suffering from transient conductive hearing loss were enrolled in the study and followed up to 3 weeks after middle ear surgery. Bone and air conduction thresholds were measured pre and postoperatively to evaluate eligibility for enrollment. Postoperative unaided and aided sound-field thresholds, as well as speech tests in quiet and noise were compared to confirm hearing improvement with the hearing system. To determine patient satisfaction, the SSQ12 and a system-specific quality of life questionnaire was administered to all subjects.

resultsSpeech perception for monosyllables in quiet improved by 46%, with statistical significance for the ADHEAR system compared to the unaided condition after one week. The functional hearing gain improved by 19 dB. Speech perception in noise with the device was - 6.7 dB SNR on average, with a statistically significant improvement of 2.7 dB SNR. The results of the questionnaire showed a high level of patient satisfaction and subjective hearing improvement. No serious skin reactions or other severe complications occurred.

conclusionAs long as the auditory canal is blocked due to tamponade, patients benefit from hearing rehabilitation. This adhesive hearing system is a safe and effective device to treat transient conductive hearing loss and may considerably improve treatment for patients even with short-term hearing loss.

Indexed as

Hearing AidsAdultBone ConductionEar CanalEar, MiddleFemaleHearingHearing Loss, ConductiveHearing TestsHumansMaleMiddle AgedNoiseOtologic Surgical ProceduresPatient SatisfactionProspective StudiesTissue AdhesivesADHEARAdhesive hearing systemBone conduction hearing aidConductive hearing lossHearing aidPressure free

Identifiers

PMID31863199
OpenAlexW2995465574

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.