ArticlePediatric radiology2020
Diagnostic equivalency of fast T2 and FLAIR sequences for pediatric brain MRI: a pilot study.
Article in Pediatric radiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- 3D-QALAS synthetic MRI with Zero-DeepSub in children: initial experience including post-contrast imaging feasibility.Pediatric radiology · 2026Article
- Evaluation of simultaneous multi-slice echo planar imaging in the diagnosis of brain lesions in pediatric patients: a quantitative and qualitative study.BMC medical imaging · 2026Article
- Domain-Adaptive MRI Learning Model for Precision Diagnosis of CNS Tumors.Biomedicines · 2026Article
- Diagnostic Performance of Fast Brain MRI Compared with Routine Clinical MRI in Patients with Glioma Grades 3 and 4: A Pilot Study.AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology · 2025Article
- Validation of a shortened MR imaging protocol for pediatric spinal pathology.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2023Article
- Pediatric magnetic resonance imaging: faster is better.Pediatric radiology · 2023Review
- Strategies to perform magnetic resonance imaging in infants and young children without sedation.Pediatric radiology · 2022Review
- Non-ionizing Imaging for the Emergency Department Assessment of Pediatric Minor Head Trauma.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundFaster and motion robust magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) sequences are desirable in pediatric brain MRI as they can help reduce the need for monitored anesthesia care, which is a costly and limited resource that carries medical risks.
objectiveTo evaluate the diagnostic equivalency of commercially available accelerated motion robust MR sequences relative to standard sequences. MATERIALS AND
methodsThis was an institutional review board-approved prospective study. Subjects underwent a clinical brain MRI using conventional multiplanar images at 3 Tesla followed by fast axial T2 and FLAIR (fluid-attenuated inversion recovery) sequences optimized for an approximately 50% reduction in acquisition time. Conventional and fast images from each subject were reviewed by two blinded pediatric neuroradiologists. The readers evaluated the presence of 12 findings. Intra-observer agreement was estimated for fast versus conventional sequences. For each set of sequences, interobserver agreement calculations and chi-square tests were used to evaluate differences between fast and conventional acquisitions. An independent third reader reviewed the intra-observer discrepancies and adjudicated them as being more conspicuous on fast sequence, conventional sequence or the equivalent. The readers also were asked to rate motion artifacts with a previously validated score.
resultsImages from 77 children (mean age: 11.3 years) were analyzed. Intra-observer agreement (fast versus conventional) ranged between 89.2% and 92.3%. Interobserver agreement ranged between 86.1% and 88.4%. Interobserver agreement was significantly higher for conventional FLAIR relative to fast FLAIR for small (<5 mm) foci of T2 in the white matter. Otherwise, interobserver agreement was not different between the fast and conventional sequences. For awake subjects, fast sequences had significantly fewer artifacts (P<0.05).
conclusionConventional T2 and FLAIR sequences can be optimized to shorten acquisition while maintaining diagnostic equivalency. These faster sequences were also less susceptible to motion artifacts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.