ArticleInternational journal of legal medicine2020
The MASTiFF panel-a versatile multiple-allele SNP test for forensics.
Article in International journal of legal medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Forensic genetic analysis of single-nucleotide polymorphisms and microhaplotypes in Koreans through next-generation sequencing using precision ID identity panel.Genes & genomics · 2023Article
- Applications of massively parallel sequencing in forensic genetics.Genetics and molecular biology · 2022Article
- A novel computational strategy to predict the value of the evidence in the SNP-based forensic mixtures.PloS one · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Forensic identification tests often need recourse to markers that can successfully type highly degraded DNA, and binary single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) have become the variants of choice for such analyses because of their short amplified fragment lengths. The two main drawbacks of SNPs are their reduced power of discrimination per marker compared with mainstream forensic STRs and an inability to robustly detect mixed DNA-particularly using capillary electrophoresis genotyping systems such as SNaPshot™, where the dye signals are much more imbalanced than those of STR profiles. This study compiled a compact set of multiple-allele SNPs consisting of loci that had three or four nucleotide variants at the same site in order to address the lack of mixture detection capability with binary SNP tests, as well as improving levels of polymorphism per SNP by transitioning to a maximum of six or ten genotypes per locus. We report the development and optimisation of a SNaPshot-based forensic test comprising 27 tri-allelic and 2 tetra-allelic SNPs, which we named MASTiFF: a multiple-allele SNP test for forensics. Assessments of the MASTiFF panel's levels of discrimination power in the five main population groups indicate random match probabilities ranging from 10
Indexed as
Identifiers
31863187What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.