Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31863154›Full record

ArticleStrahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al]2020

Hybrid planning techniques for hypofractionated whole-breast irradiation using flattening filter-free beams.

Karunakaran Balaji, Sitaraman Balaji Subramanian, Krishnamoorthi Sathiya, Moorthi Thirunavukarasu, Chandrasekaran Anu Radha, Velayudham Ramasubramanian

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al], 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Hybrid volumetric modulated arc therapy for hypofractionated radiotherapy of breast cancer: a treatment planning study.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Karunakaran BalajiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Gleneagles Global Hospitals, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India. karthik.balaji85@gmail.com.
Sitaraman Balaji SubramanianDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Gleneagles Global Hospitals, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
Krishnamoorthi SathiyaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Gleneagles Global Hospitals, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
Moorthi ThirunavukarasuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Gleneagles Global Hospitals, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
Chandrasekaran Anu RadhaSchool of Advanced Sciences, Vellore Institute of Technology, Vellore, India.
Velayudham RamasubramanianSchool of Advanced Sciences, Vellore Institute of Technology, Vellore, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4834-1141
Global Hospitals · INVellore Institute of Technology University · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe aim of this study was to assess the feasibility of flattening filter-free (FFF) photon beams in hybrid intensity-modulated radiation therapy (H-IMRT) and hybrid volumetric modulated arc therapy (H-VMAT) for left-sided whole-breast radiation therapy with a boost volume (RT) using a hypofractionated dose regimen. PATIENTS AND

methodsRT plans of 25 patients with left-sided early-stage breast cancer were created with H‑IMRT and H‑VMAT techniques under breath-hold conditions using 6‑MV FFF beams. In hybrid techniques, three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT) plans were kept as base-dose plans for the VMAT and IMRT plans. In addition, H‑IMRT in step-and-shoot mode was also calculated to assess its achievability with FFF beams.

resultsAll hybrid plans achieved the expected target coverage. H‑VMAT showed better coverage and homogeneity index results for the boost target (p < 0.002), while H‑IMRT presented better results for the whole-breast target (p < 0.001). Mean doses to normal tissues were comparable between both plans, while H‑IMRT reduced the low-dose levels to heart and ipsilateral lung (p < 0.05). H‑VMAT revealed significantly better results with regard to monitor units (MU) and treatment time (p < 0.001).

conclusionThe 6‑MV FFF beam technique is feasible for large-field 3DCRT-based hybrid planning in whole-breast and boost planning target volume irradiation. For breath-hold patients, the H‑VMAT plan is superior to H‑IMRT for hypofractionated dose regimens, with reduced MU and treatment delivery time.

Indexed as

Radiation Dose HypofractionationBreast NeoplasmsCombined Modality TherapyFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansMastectomy, SegmentalNeoplasm StagingPhotonsRadiometryRadiotherapy, ConformalRadiotherapy, Intensity-ModulatedRadiotherapy Planning, Computer-AssistedTumor BurdenBreast neoplasmsPhotonsRadiation dose hypofractionationRadiotherapyRadiotherapy, intensity-modulated

Identifiers

PMID31863154
OpenAlexW2996653560

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.